Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;47(2):95–107. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3935

Table 4.

Panel description and results obtained at the first and second rounds of Delphi on occupational burnout definition.[NA=not available.]

Experts who agreed participating Experts completing 1st round Experts completing 2nd round

N (%) N (%) N (%)
Number of participants 60 (100) 55 (92) 50 (83)
Gender
 Male 21 (35) 20 (36) 18 (36)
 Female 39 (65) 35 (64) 32 (64)
Age (years)
 <30 1 (2) 1 (2) 1 (2)
 30–44 21 (35) 19 (35) 18 (36)
 45–60 27 (45) 24 (44) 21 (42)
 >60 11 (18) 11 (20) 10 (20)
Highest education degree
 Bachelor 1 (2) 1 (2) 1 (2)
 Master 7 (12) 6 (11) 6 (11)
 MD 13 (22) 12 (22) 11 (22)
 PhD 39 (65) 36 (65) 32 (64)
Field of education
 Medicine 37 (62) 36 (66) 34 (68)
 Psychology 15 (25) 15 (27) 13 (26)
 Life sciences 4 (7) 3 (5) 2 (4)
 Other 4 (6) 1 (2) 1 (2)
Main occupation
 Occupational physician 20 (34) 18 (33) 18 (36)
 Psychiatrist 5 (9) 4 (7) 4 (8)
 General or other practitioner 3 (4) 3 (5) 3 (6)
 Psychologist 12 (20) 12 (22) 10 (20)
 Researcher 20 (33) 18 (33) 15 (30)
Length of occupational experience (years)
 <5 1 (2) 1 (2) 1 (2)
 5–9 15 (25) 12 (22) 11 (22)
 10–14 2 (3) 2 (4) 2 (4)
 15–20 17 (28) 16 (29) 13 (26)
 >20 25 (42) 24 (44) 23 (46)
Source of expertise on burnout
 Clinical practice 28 (47) 26 (47) 23 (46)
 Research practice 46 (80) 42 (76) 38 (76)
Situation regarding the OMEGA-NET
 OMEGA-NET member 33 (55) 31 (56) 29 (58)
 External participant 27 (45) 24 (44) 21 (42)
Term preferred for concept introduction NA
 Term 1 a NA 17 (31) 12 (24)
 Term 2 b NA 37 (69) 37 (76)
Degree of agreement on the concept definition NA
 Mean ± Standard deviation NA 5.9± 2.2 7.0± 1.6
 Median NA 6 7
 Proportion of agreement (vote ≥7) NA 23 (42) 41 (82)
a

Term 1: ‘occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state’.

b

Term 2: ‘occupational burnout’.