Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 1;56(1):44–50. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2020.20193

Table 1.

Comparison of left ventricle M mode and pulsed wave Doppler variables between groups

Variables Patients (n=30) Control (n=30) p
LVDd (mm/m2) 43.07±8.92 44.91±7.21 0.385
LVIDs (mm/m2) 27.21±5.32 28.72±4.70 0.249
FS (%) 36.03±3.39 36.21±3.83 0.848
LVMI (g/m2) 66.73±27.10 61.66±19.11 0.405
E (m/sec) 1.00±0.15 1.01±0.16 0.647
A (m/sec) 0.61±0.12 0.60±0.12 0.780
E:A 1.75±0.40 1.74±0.34 0.844
DT (msec) 118.80±24.30 118.50±22.1 0.969
E’ (m/sec) 0.18±0.03 0.18±0.03 0.671
A’ (m/sec) 0.11±0.17 0.09±0.13 0.608
E’:A’ 2.80±0.70 2.74±0.70 0.714
S (m/sec) 0.08±0.01 0.09±0.02 0.113

A, peak velocity of late transmitral flow; A’, peak velocity of diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler; DT, deceleration time; E, peak velocity of early diastolic transmitral flow; E’, peak velocity of early diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed wave Doppler; E:A, ratio of E to A; E':A', ratio of E' to A'; FS, fractional shortening; LVDd, left ventricular internal dimension at end-diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular internal dimension at end-systole; LVMI, left ventricular mass index, S: Systolic myocardial velocity.