Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;11:10104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89505-9

Table 2.

Median copeptin concentrations of all three patients’ cohorts at any measured timepoint using the three different copeptin assays.

KRYPTOR LIA ELISA p-value
Healthy volunteers (n = 30)
Plasma copeptin (pmol/l) 14.7 [8.8, 20.6] 10.1 [7.1, 14.0] 48.1 [35.4, 59.0]  < 0.001*
 KRYPTOR vs LIA 14.7 [8.8, 20.6] 10.1 [7.1, 14.0]  < 0.001*
 KRYPTOR vs ELISA 14.7 [8.8, 20.6] 48.1 [35.4, 59.0]  < 0.001*
 LIA vs ELISA 10.1 [7.1, 14.0] 48.1 [35.4, 59.0]  < 0.001*
Severely ill patients (n = 40)
Plasma copeptin (pmol/l) 74.3 [50.5, 135.1] 70.9 [47.8, 108.6] 80.1 [70.2, 125.0] 0.025*
 KRYPTOR vs LIA 74.3 [50.5, 135.1] 70.9 [47.8, 108.6] 0.023*
 KRYPTOR vs ELISA 74.3 [50.5, 135.1] 80.1 [70.2, 125.0] 1
 LIA vs ELISA 70.9 [47.8, 108.6] 80.1 [70.2, 125.0] 0.71
Polyuria-polydipsia patients (n = 80)
Plasma copeptin (pmol/l) 2.9 [1.6, 10.3] 2.8 [0.7, 9.7] 17.9 [11.3, 28.9]  < 0.001*
 KRYPTOR vs LIA 2.9 [1.6, 10.3] 2.8 [0.7, 9.7] 0.70
 KRYPTOR vs ELISA 2.9 [1.6, 10.3] 17.9 [11.3, 28.9]  < 0.001*
 LIA vs ELISA 2.8 [0.7, 9.7] 17.9 [11.3, 28.9]  < 0.001*

Copeptin was measured in duplicates with the KRYPTOR, the LIA and the ELISA. Continuous variables are expressed as median [interquartile range]. Three-group comparison was done using the Friedman Test. Posthoc two group comparison was done using the paired Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test with Bonferroni p-value adjustment.

*Statistically significant.