Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;11:10155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89054-1

Table 3.

F values, degrees of freedom, p values and holm corrected post hoc comparisons with corrections relative to time-on-task and location separated by handedness for models with the outcome reaction time.

Handedness Predictor F df p Significant post hoc comparisons
1. Left-Handers Time .621 1, 1630 .431
Location 68.97 5, 1631 < .001 L2 > L3, L4; L6 > L1, L2, L3, L4, L5; L1 > L2, L3, L4, L5; L5 > L3, L4
Time * location 1.643 5, 1630 .146
2. Right-Handers Time 14.01 1, 1767 < .001 1st half < 2nd half
Location 64.23 5, 1768 < .001 L1 > L2, L3, L4, L5; L2 > L3, L4; L5 > L3, L4; L6 > L2, L3, L4, L5
Time * location 2.62 5, 1767 .023 1st half L1 < 2nd half L1; 1st half L1 > 1st half L2, 1st half L3, 1st half L4, 1st half L5; 1st half L6 > 1st half L2, 1st half L2; 1st half L6 > 1st half L3, 1st half L4, 1st half L5; 2nd half L6 > 2nd half L2, 2nd half L3, 2nd half L4, 2nd half L5; 2nd half L1 > 2nd half L2, 2nd half L3, 2nd half L4, 2nd half L5

For post hoc analyses < and > indicate the direction of the effect. For example, L2 > L3 reflects higher reaction time at location 2 compared to location 3. Only relevant post hoc comparisons reaching statistical significance (p < .05) following corrections for multiple comparisons are reported for interactions.