Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;126(4):668–683. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-00389-3

Table 2.

Summary table of the divergence history between the populations from Iceland and Norway inferred with (SV incl.) and without (SV excl.) the chromosomes carrying putative SVs.

Data Model AIC ΔAIC WAIC TS TSC or AM P
SC_af_2m 1678.00 0.00 0.67 57.91 28.19 1.47
SC_af_rf_2m 1680.00 2.00 0.25 67.46 28.26 1.60
SVs IM_af_2m 1684.00 6.00 0.03 96.40 49.89
incl. IM_af_rf_2m 1684.00 6.00 0.03 96.60 0.55
AM_af_2m 1687.00 9.00 0.01 96.35 0.27 49.62
AM_af_rf_2m 1688.00 10.00 0.01 97.48 0.16 49.42
SC_af_2m 1620.00 0.00 0.59 54.56 26.74 1.05
SC_af_rf_2m 1622.00 2.00 0.22 60.71 31.36 0.87
SVs IM_af_rf_2m 1623.00 3.00 0.13 89.37 0.44
excl. IM_af_2m 1625.00 5.00 0.05 93.68 49.90
AM_af_2m 1628.00 8.00 0.01 92.85 0.16 47.38
AM_af_rf_2m 1630.00 10.00 0.00 96.32 0.19 48.65

In order of appearance, the table shows the dataset used for the inferences, the six best models sorted by AIC, their AIC, the difference of AIC with the best model (ΔAIC), the weighted AIC (WAIC), the time of split between populations (TS), the time of secondary contact or ancestral migration (TAM or SC), and the percentage of the genome affected by reduced migration rate (P).

The best model for each pairwise comparison is highlighted in bold.