Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;9(5):e27342. doi: 10.2196/27342

Table 1.

Results of vector autoregression analysis on the number of confirmed case reports, symptom onsets, nighttime population volume, and Rt per week.a

Variable Lag Rt b Nighttime population volume Symptom onsets Confirmed case reports


Coefficient (95% CI) P value Coefficient (95% CI) P value Coefficient (95% CI) P value Coefficient (95% CI) P value
Rt 1 –1.00 (–1.41 to –0.59)c <.001 0.04 (–0.11 to 0.20) .58 0.30 (0.06 to 0.55)c .02 –0.03 (–0.22 to 0.17) .80

2 –0.17 (–0.76 to 0.42) .58 –0.16 (–0.39 to 0.06) .15 0.22 (–0.14 to 0.58) .22 –0.24 (–0.52 to 0.05) .10

3 0.02 (–0.51 to 0.56) .93 –0.71 (–0.91 to 0.50)* <.001 0.12 (–0.20 to 0.44) .48 –0.14 (–0.40 to 0.11) .28

4 –0.12 (–0.46 to 0.22) .50 –0.38 (–0.51 to –0.25)c <.001 0.07 (–0.13 to 0.28) .48 0.08 (–0.09 to 0.24) .36
Nighttime population volume 1 0.42 (–0.11 to 0.95) .12 –0.25 (–0.45 to –0.05)c .01 0.60 (0.28 to 0.92)c <.001 –0.05 (–0.31 to 0.20) .69

2 0.41 (–0.14 to 0.95) .14 0.29 (0.08 to 0.49)c .006 –0.17 (–0.50 to 0.16) .30 –0.26 (–0.52 to –0.001)c .05

3 1.30 (0.72 to 1.89)c <.001 –0.52 (–0.74 to –0.29)c <.001 0.63 (0.28 to 0.99)c <.001 –0.33 (–0.61 to –0.05)c .02

4 0.59 (0.04 to 1.14)c .03 –0.03 (–0.24 to 0.18) .77 0.59 (0.26 to 0.92)c <.001 0.07 (–0.20 to 0.33) .62
Symptom onset 1 –0.57 (–1.25 to 0.11) .10 0.02 (–0.24 to 0.27) .90 0.35 (–0.06 to 0.76) .09 1.40 (1.07 to 1.72)c <.001

2 –1.50 (–2.69 to –0.32)c .01 1.05 (0.61 to 1.50)c <.001 –0.47 (–1.19 to 0.25) .20 0.15 (–0.42 to 0.71) .62

3 1.42 (0.50 to 2.35)c .002 –0.10 (–0.45 to 0.25) .59 0.12 (–0.44 to 0.68) .68 –0.35 (–0.79 to 0.09) .12

4 –0.58 (–1.33 to 0.18) .13 0.38 (0.10 to 0.67)c .008 0.24 (–0.22 to 0.70) .31 0.45 (0.09 to 0.81)c .02
Confirmed case reports 1 0.14 (–0.62 to 0.91) .72 –0.44 (–0.73 to –0.15)c .003 0.06 (–0.40 to 0.53) .79 –0.37 (–0.74 to –0.003)c .048

2 –0.20 (–0.80 to 0.39) .50 –0.29 (–0.52 to –0.07)c .01 0.25 (–0.11 to 0.61) .17 0.02 (–0.27 to 0.30) .91

3 –0.22 (–0.70 to
0.26)
.36 –0.65 (–0.84 to –0.47)c <.001 –0.22 (–0.51 to 0.07) .14 –0.07 (–0.30 to 0.16) .55

4 0.51 (0.18 to 0.84)c .002 –0.31 (–0.44 to –0.19)c <.001 0.07 (–0.12 to 0.27) .46 –0.18 (–0.34 to –0.02)c .02
Social measures in restaurants and bars (August 3 to September 15, 2020) N/Ad –0.07 (–0.27 to 0.14) .52 0.004 (–0.07 to 0.08) .91 –0.07 (–0.20 to 0.05) .25 –0.02 (–0.11 to 0.08) .72
First-wave countermeasures (April 7 to May 24, 2020) N/A 0.04 (–0.29 to 0.38) .82 0.18 (0.05 to 0.30)c .006 –0.03 (–0.24 to 0.17) .74 –0.05 (–0.21 to 0.11) .56

aThe number of optimal lags was determined by information criteria, including the Akaike information criterion, Hannan–Quinn information criterion, Schiwarz-Bayesian information criteria, and final prediction error.

bRt: effective reproduction number.

cSignificant at P<.05.

dN/A: not applicable.