Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;67(2):79–93. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1603731

Table 1.

Summary of included articles’ methodological quality, participant and program characteristics, and key findings (outcomes), organized by methodology.

  Study Authors, Country, Design, Theory (if applicable) Quality Rating Sample Size
(N, Female)
Age - Years
(Range and Mean [M])
Disability Program Details Data Collection Tool(s) Key Findings
Qualitative Hutchison et al.2008
Canada
Case Study
(Social Justice Philosophy)
88.1 (high) 3
(1 female)
6–15
M = 10
Developmental Disability Camp Crystal Sands (Project Rainbow)—Traditional Overnight Summer Camp Experience
Canoeing, hiking, archery, campfire, arts, crafts, ropes, basketball, volleyball, and swimming
8-week camp (1 week with study)
1 inclusion counselor, 2 general counselors/cabin of 10 attendees; adapted equipment
Participant Observation, Document Analysis, Interviews with Staff (+) partnership to develop inclusion
(+) full participation, in all activities
(+) structured camp team to support
(−) need more socialization opportunities
  McConkey et al.2013
Europe (Germany, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, & Ukraine)
Interviews
76.2 (moderate) 156 athletes
106 partners
65 coaches
Males > Females (not specified)
12–25 years
(M not specified)
Intellectual Disability Unified Sport (Special Olympics)—7-a-side football and basketball
No further program details provided
Athlete information provided by coaches, semi-structured interview guide (+) all youth: stamina, technical skills, status in school and community, self-belief, self-esteem, confidence, communication skills, involvement external to sport, friendships with teammates
(+) equality and respect fostering relationships
(+) ND youth: attitudes and social relationships with D
(+) program-community alliances fostering recruitment
  Sutherland and Stroot 2009*
USA
Ethnography
(Social Cognitive Theory)
81.0 (high) 7
(3 female)
10–14 years
(M not specified)
High functioning autism spectrum disorder Smith Rock trip (No Limits)
3 full days
Rock climbing trip: climbing, campfire, teambuilding activities
Unspecified trip leaders
Semi-structured interviews, observation checklist (5-point Likert scale) (+) D social interaction with ND youth: communicating with others & social acceptance
(+) D defined role in group as helper—valued team member
  Sutherland and Stroot 2010*
USA
Ethnography
(Grounded Theory)
76.2 (moderate) 7
(3 female)
10–14 years
(M not specified)
High functioning autism spectrum disorder Smith Rock trip (No Limits)
3 full days
Rock climbing trip: climbing, campfire, teambuilding activities
Unspecified trip leaders
Semi-structured interviews, observation checklist (5-point Likert scale) (−) First contact due to existing group dynamics of ND youth
(+) Opinion of one ND youth can change others’ opinions of D
(+) Teambuilding activities fostered social acceptance
Quantitative Baran et al.2009
Turkey
Pre-Post Test
52.4 (low) 46
(0 female)
12–15
M = 14 years
Mild Intellectual Disabilities based on Leither and WISC-R Intelligence tests Unified Sport (Special Olympics)—Soccer
8 weeks, 3×/week, 90 minutes/session
Coaches: certified for working with intellectual disabilities and soccer; 2 coaches per group of 4 youth with a head coach (total of 9 coaches)
Special Olympics Unified Sports Questionnaire for (a) Parents, Teachers, and Coaches; (b) Athletes, Partner, Family Member, and Coach (−) D only interacted with ND youth in program; getting along with others
(−) ND youth did not learn about disability
(−) ND youth enjoyment
(+) parental report D and ND youth had better well-being
72.5% D attrition
37.5% ND youth attrition
50% ND youth domination
37.5% reported trouble matching age
  Baran et al.2013
Turkey

Randomized Comparative Intervention
66.7 (moderate) 98
(0 female)
12–15
M = 14.5 years
Mild Intellectual Disabilities based on an IQ < 50 Unified Sport (Special Olympics)—soccer

8 weeks, 3×/week, 90 minutes/session

Coaches: certified for working with intellectual disabilities and soccer; 2 coaches per group of 4 youth with a head coach (total of 9 coaches)
Transportation provided to all participants; information session for parents and youth
Brockport Physical Fitness Test
Football Athletes Skills Assessment
(−) ND youth flexibility & shooting compared to D
(+) D: hand grip, standing long jump and flexed & hang
(+) D slalom compared to ND youth
(−) Pass, dribble & shoot, & total score ND youth in control compared to all other groups
  Castagno 2001
USA
Pre-Post Test
66.7 (moderate) 58
(1 female)
11–14
M = 13 years
Mental Retardation
Mean IQ = 67
Unified Sport (Special Olympics)—Basketball
8 weeks, 3×/week, 90 minutes/session
Coach: one with no assistants; 4 teams of 12–19 players each; followed the Unified Sports Guidebook for lesson plans; intramural tournament at end
Katz-Zigler Self-Esteem Inventory; Basketball Sport Skill Assessment; Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test; Adjective Checklist; The Friendship Activity Scale; Unified Sports Questionnaire (+) D: self-esteem, basketball skills, positive adjectives, friendship (effect sizes: .43–1.14)

(+) ND youth: self-esteem, basketball skills, friendship, attitudes towards D, positive adjectives (effect sizes: .22–.80)
(+, coach reported) all youth: sport interest, adherence to Unified Sports, interest in new sports, interest in new friends, self-esteem, self-confidence, happiness
(+, coach reported) most (70–83%) ND youth: self-reliance, tolerance of others, desire to connect with the community, school motivation
(NC, coach reported) all youth conflict with peers and family
  Ninot and Maïano 2007
France
Randomized Controlled Trial
59.5 (low) 48
(48 female)
13–17
M = 15 years
Mild-moderate intellectual disability of non-organic origin
(40–78 on Revised Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children)
Competitive swimming and basketball
21 months, 2 hours/week, 12 competitions
4 teams with trained coaches: basketball segregated, swimming segregated, basketball inclusive, swimming inclusive
2 control groups: physical education & sedentary
Harter’s SPP (perceived competence): scholastic competence, social acceptance, athletic competence, physical appearance, conduct
General self-worth
(−) General self-worth: Basketball inclusion group less than physical education control
(−) Perceived athletic competence: Basketball inclusion less than swimming and basketball segregated groups
(NC) Social acceptance
  Özer et al.2012
Turkey
RCT
71.4
(moderate)
76
(0 female)
12–15 Intellectual Disability Unified Sport Soccer vs. traditional soccer (segregated teams)
8 weeks, 3×/week, 90 minutes/session
Coaches had "necessary experience and qualifications both for teaching children with ID and for coaching the sport of soccer." (p. 232)
Child Behavior Checklist, Friendship Activity scale, Adjective Checklist (+) competence for D youth

(+) parents’ perceptions of D youth for internalizing and externalizing behaviors
(+/−) control group baseline higher positive associations that decreased post-program
(+) control group child behavior ND youth
(−) ND youth adjective and friendship association with D youth in control group
(+) ND youth in intervention adjective association with D youth
  Stanish and Temple 2012
USA
Pre-Post Test
69.0 (moderate) 34
(19 female)
15–21
M = 17.8 years (D)
M = 16.4 years (ND)
Intellectual Disability
IQ <75
Team Up for Fitness (YMCA)
15 weeks, 2×/week, 60 minutes/session
Certified fitness trainers created individualized exercise plan, ND peer acted as the ‘workout buddy’
Training session for ND peer partners
Attendance, Exercise engagement (tracking all physical activity, exercise records for the sessions), Brockport Physical Fitness Test, 6-Minute Walk Test, Body Mass Index (+) 89.5% & 88.3% attendance for D and ND youth, respectively
(+) Exercise engagement: Aerobic (84%), Stretching (89.5%), Strength (44.4%)
(+) all youth fitness: curl-ups, 6-minute walk test, body mass index

D: disability; IQ: intelligence quotient; M: mean; NC: no change; ND: no disability; YMCA: Young Men’s Christian Association; *indicates one data set across multiple articles.