Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;7:52. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00255-3

Table 3.

Likely pathogenic missense variants of NTHL1 selected by population rarity or deleterious in silico tool predictions in case–control data of ten multi-center international cohorts.

NTHL1 missense variants Case n = 27,421 Control n = 19,759 OR 95% CI p Value
Carriers % Carriers %
Totala 316 1.15 179 0.91 1.28 1.06–1.54 0.01
Rare (MAF ≤ 0.001)b 121 0.44 70 0.35 1.25 0.92–1.7 0.16
Rare (MAF ≤ 0.0001)b 92 0.34 49 0.25 1.35 0.95–1.96 0.09
Condel (deleterious) 175 0.64 92 0.47 1.37 1.06–1.79 0.02
PolyPhen2 (damaging) 161 0.59 83 0.42 1.4 1.07–1.85 0.01
SIFT (deleterious) 268 0.98 146 0.74 1.33 1.08–1.63 0.006
CADD (≥10) 282 1.03 155 0.78 1.31 1.08–1.61 0.006
REVEL (≥0.75) 144 0.53 72 0.36 1.44 1.08–1.94 0.01

aIncludes all the missense variants identified.

bMAF, minor allele frequency in non-cancer non-Finnish Europeans in gnomAD database.