Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0249698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249698

Table 5. Previous published series on coronary perforation with covered stent implantation.

Study Enrolment years No of patients with perforation Percentage of covered stent implantation Covered Stent type Success rate of hemostasis Follow-up Outcomes
Data available for the covered stent population MACE Stent thrombosis TVR TLR Death MI
Kawamoto et al. 2015 [22] 2004–2015 285 20% ePTFE 88% 30-days YES 28% 0% 2% 2% 7%; 2% 18%
6-months 16% 2% 11% 8% 6%; 4% 2%
1-year 22% 2% 17% 8% 6%; 4% 2%
2-years 32% 5% 22% 8% 11%; 9% 5%
3 years 38% 5% 26% 12% 17%; 15% 5%
Chen et al. 2015 [26] 2008–2013 9 100% Processed equine pericardium 100% Up to 32 months YES NA 11% 44% (1-ST; 2-ISR; 1- occluded) 0% 22%
Lee et al. 2016 [27] 2004–2016 48 100% ePTFE 100% 30 days YES NA 0% NA 0% 16.7%; 13% 0%
1 year NA 16% NA 22% 26%; 22% 6%
3 years NA 22% NA 52% 38%; 29% 9%
Lemmert et al. 2017 [7] 2005–2016 150 24% NA NA In hospital YES NA NA NA NA 14% NA
30 days NA NA NA NA 25% NA
1 year NA NA NA NA 37% NA
Guttmann et al. 2017 [28] 2005–2016 149 21% NA NA In hospital YES NA NA NA NA 16% NA
1.4 year (median) 29.6% NA
Mirza et al. 2018 [29] 2009–2016 24 62.5% ePTFE NA 2 years YES NA 6.7% NA NA 0% 0%
Kufner et al. 2018 [30] 2013–2017 61 100% ePTFE 96.7% In-hospital YES NA 0% NA 0% 8.2%; 8.2% 31.1%
<1 year NA 0% NA 18.0% 11.5%; 8.2% 31.1%
Kandzari et al. 2019 [31] 2013–2017 80 100% Electrospun polyurethane 91.3% In-hospital YES NA 1.2% NA NA 10% 0%
Hachinohe et al. 2019 [19] 1997–2007 53 100% ePTFE, Processed equine pericardium NA 1 year YES NA 11.9% 18.8% ^ 19.6% 4.2 13.5%*
5 years 23.9% 38.4%^ 37.7% 10.2% 20.6%*
10 years 23.9% 38.4%^ 41.6% 14.4% 20.6%*
Rossel et al. 2019 [32] 2007–2017 55 43.6% ePTFE, Processed equine pericardium 95.8% In-hospital YES NA NA NA NA 8.3% NA
1 year 23.8% 0% NA NA 9.5% NA
5 years 58.8% 4.2% NA NA 26.7% NA
Parikh et al. 2019 [17] 2003–2017 67 35.8% ePTFE NA 30 days YES NA 0% NA 0% 8% NA
1 year NA NA NA 4.2% 16.7% NA
4 years NA NA NA 12.5% 50% NA
Itoh et al. 2020 [33] 2003–2014 82 18.3% ePTFE 73.3% In-hospital YES NA NA NA NA 26.7% 13%
Cerrato et al. 2020 [34] 1998–2018 311 48.2% NA 84% In-hospital NO 38.2% 2.2% NA 2.9% 6.1% 28.3%
Harnek et al. 2020 SCAAR Registry [5] 2005–2017 1008 16.5% ePTFE, Processed equine pericardium, Electrospun polyurethane NA 1 year YES 34.3% 3.6% NA 10.2% 19.3% 7.8%
Hernández-Enríquez et al. 2020 [35] 2012–2017 61 100% ePTFE, Electrospun polyurethane 75% In-hospital YES 31% 2% NA 0% 18% 7%
1 year 57% 4% 10% 7% 36%; 33% 9%
Jurado-Roman et al.2020 [23] 2014–2019 52 100% Electrospun polyurethane 94.2% 22 ± 16 months YES 7.7% 0% NA 3.8% 3.8% 3.8%*
Wańha et al.2021 CRACK Registry 2009–2019 119 100% ePTFE, Processed equine pericardium, Electrospun polyurethane 83% 30 days YES* 15.1% 5% 8.1% 8.1% 6.1% 6.1%
1 year 26.2% 6.1% 15.2% 13.1% 7.1% 11.0%

MACE- major adverse cardiovascular events; ST- stent thrombosis; TVR- target vessel revascularization; TLR- target lesion revascularization; MI- myocardial infarction

*Periprocedural death and patients required emergency cardiac surgery were excluded from the one-year analysis

‡cardiac death

^target vessel occlusion

*Target vessel MI.