Abstract

Numerous epidemiological and experimental studies indicate that early life environmental exposures influence health and disease later in life.1 Environmental exposures can also influence the immune system, and studies suggest even subtle changes may diminish resistance to infectious disease,2,3,4 reduce vaccine efficacy,5,6 dampen tumor surveillance,7 and cause autoimmune and allergic diseases.8,9 Building on evidence that developmental exposure to pollutants that bind to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) causes lasting changes in immune function,2,3,4 a report published in Environmental Health Perspectives examined how developmental exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) affects T-cell function.10

Much of what we know about the AhR and the immune system comes from looking at direct exposures to the mature immune system. But rodent studies of prenatal and early-life exposures show new evidence for potential mechanisms behind chemical-induced developmental immunotoxicity. © Pacific Press/Science Source.
TCDD toxicity is mediated through activation of the AhR, a protein of ancient origins that acts as an environmental sensor for the proper functioning of cells and organs.7 Its evolutionary conservation and broad expression in the immune system have prompted numerous studies into the role of AhR in immune function.11 However, much of what is known about the AhR and the immune system is based on the evaluation of direct exposure to the mature immune system, not in the context of developmental exposure, says B. Paige Lawrence, a professor in the Department of Environmental Medicine at the University of Rochester and senior author of the new study.
To examine how developmental exposure affects the responsive capacity of the offspring’s immune system, the research team exposed mice during gestation and early lactation. They then challenged the adult offspring with influenza A virus. Finally, they compared the transcriptome (all the mRNA expressed by the mice), genomewide DNA methylation, and function of CD4+ T cells in infected animals to those of uninfected offspring from control and TCDD-treated dams.
TCDD exposure during development induced important differences in DNA methylation that lasted long after exposure ended. These differences were, at least in part, responsible for variances between how the treated mice responded to infection compared with controls. After infection, both groups of mice had additional differences in DNA methylation, compared with those exposed to TCDD without infection. However, TCDD-treated mice had 20% more regions of DNA where the methylation pattern was altered in the face of a challenge, compared with controls.
The investigators also found evidence suggesting that the differences in response capacity of CD4+ T cells could be modified later in life. They gave the offspring drugs that either boost or dampen overall DNA methylation, which alleviated some of the deficits in T cell responses to infection. Lawrence says this indicates that human studies on phenotypic profiles, gene expression, or DNA methylation patterns in circulating T cells may be obtaining incomplete or inaccurate information if T cells are not activated.
Although AhR is perhaps best known for its role in mediating the chemical toxicity of environmental contaminants, focus is now shifting toward its response to endogenous signals. AhR activation has been linked to control of cell differentiation and pluripotency,12 implicating it in autoimmune and degenerative diseases, as well as cancer.
The initial research on AhR activation via toxicants opened the door to studies into other ligands and their relevance to human disease, says Francisco Quintana, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the new study. Quintana posits that the effects observed in this study could help elucidate how exposure to pollutants affect differential responses of the immune system to infections or tumors. He suggests that future studies should aim to recapitulate whether these effects are applicable to endogenous chemicals, too.
Biography
Florencia Pascual, PhD, is a Durham, NC–based freelance science writer.
References
- 1.Simeoni U, Armengaud JB, Siddeek B, Tolsa JF. 2018. Perinatal origins of adult disease. Neonatology 113(4):393–399, PMID: 29852488, 10.1159/000487618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boule LA, Winans B, Lawrence BP. 2014. Effects of developmental activation of the AhR on CD4+ T-cell responses to influenza virus infection in adult mice. Environ Health Perspect 122(11):1201–1208, PMID: 25051576, 10.1289/ehp.1408110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Post CM, Boule LA, Burke CG, O’Dell CT, Winans B, Lawrence BP, et al. 2019. The ancestral environment shapes antiviral CD8+ T cell responses across generations. iScience 20:168–183, PMID: 31569050, 10.1016/j.isci.2019.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burke CG, Myers JR, Boule LA, Post CM, Brookes PS, Lawrence BP, et al. 2019. Early life exposures shape the CD4+ T cell transcriptome, influencing proliferation, differentiation, and mitochondrial dynamics later in life. Sci Rep 9(1):11489, PMID: 31391494, 10.1038/s41598-019-47866-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grandjean P, Andersen EW, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Nielsen F, Mølbak K, Weihe P, et al. 2012. Serum vaccine antibody concentrations in children exposed to perfluorinated compounds. JAMA 307(4):391–397, PMID: 22274686, 10.1001/jama.2011.2034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Timmermann CAG, Jensen KJ, Nielsen F, Budtz-Jørgensen E, van der Klis F, Benn CS, et al. 2020. Serum perfluoroalkyl substances, vaccine responses, and morbidity in a cohort of Guinea-Bissau children. Environ Health Perspect 128(8):087002, PMID: 32772733, 10.1289/EHP6517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Casey SC, Vaccari M, Al-Mulla F, Al-Temaimi R, Amedei A, Barcellos-Hoff MH, et al. 2015. The effect of environmental chemicals on the tumor microenvironment. Carcinogenesis 36(suppl 1):S160–S183, PMID: 26106136, 10.1093/carcin/bgv035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Selmi C, Lu Q, Humble MC. 2012. Heritability versus the role of the environment in autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 39(4):249–252, PMID: 22980030, 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murrison LB, Brandt EB, Myers JB, Hershey GKK. 2019. Environmental exposures and mechanisms in allergy and asthma development. J Clin Invest, PMID: 30741719, 10.1172/JCI124612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Burke CJ, Myers JR, Post CM, Boulé LA, Lawrence BP. 2021. DNA methylation patterns in CD4+ T cells of naïve and influenza A virus-infected mice developmentally exposed to an aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand. Environ Health Perspect 129(1):17007, PMID: 33449811, 10.1289/EHP7699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rothhammer V, Quintana FJ. 2019. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: an environmental sensor integrating immune responses in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 19(3):184–197, PMID: 30718831, 10.1038/s41577-019-0125-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mulero-Navarro S, Fernandez-Salguero PM. 2016. New trends in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. Front Cell Dev Biol 4:45, PMID: 27243009, 10.3389/fcell.2016.00045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
