Skip to main content
. 2021 May 13;413(22):5619–5632. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03315-6

Table 1.

Overview over different assay principles and commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests in comparison to CoVRapid CL-MIA (n.s., not specified)

Assay principle Test, manufacturer Used antigen Assay duration Specificity in % Sensitivity in % Literature
Lateral flow assay Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device, Abbott Laboratories n.s. 10–20 min 99.4 93.0 [13]
STANDARD™ Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Duo Test, SD Biosensor Inc N 15 min 100 64.9 [14]
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgG, EUROIMMUN AG S1 2 h 98 82.5 [14]
EDI™ Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 IgG ELISA, Epitope Diagnostics Inc N, S < 2 h 98 85.6 [14]
Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG, Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering Co n.s. n.s. 88.9–98 70.1–95.0 [14, 15]
LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG, DiaSorin S.p.A S1, S2 35 min 96.8–99 81.4–82.4 [14, 15]
iFlash-SARS-CoV-2, Shenzhen Yhlo Biotech Co. Ltd. N, S > 12 min 92.9–100 76.9–93.0 [15, 16]
SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Abbott Laboratories N 29 min 99–100 64.5–92.6 [13, 14, 16]
Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Roche Diagnostics GmbH N 18 min 100 80.5–83.5 [14, 16]
Microarray immunoassay (MIA) xMAP SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG Assay, Luminex Corporation N, S1, RBD 2.5 h 99.3 96.3 [17, 18]
CoVRapid CL-MIA, Technical University of Munich N, S1, RBD 8 min 100 100 This work