Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 19;29(5):1782–1793. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.12.024

Figure 4.

Figure 4

In vivo viral replication and oncolytic effect of FUVAC

(A) Schedule of MDRVV or FUVAC treatment against the bilateral CT26 tumor model. CT26 cells were bilaterally transplanted on BALB/c mice through subcutaneous injection. When the average tumor volume reached 60 mm3, 5 × 107 PFUs of MDRVV or FUVAC-Luc/LacZ were intratumorally injected three times every 2 days. (B) In vivo bioluminescence imaging of the viral replication. Viral Fluc luminescence was detected by VivoGlo Luciferin (3 mg/mouse; Promega) on day 3. (C) Quantification of the viral luminescence on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after the first virus injection. Fluc signals were separately quantified in the injection and non-injection sites. Mean luminescence (ph/s) ± SEM are shown. ∗p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA). (D) Tumor growth was separately monitored in the injection and non-injection sites. Results are representative of two independent experiments comprising 6–8 mice/group (n = 12, 14, or 15 for PBS, MDRVV, or FUVAC, respectively). Mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SEM are shown. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVA).