Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 29;12:619780. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619780

Table 1.

ERP components by time latency and functional significance.

ERP Time latency after stimulus onset (ms) Functional significance
N100
(or N1)
90–200 Early sensory processing and automatic orienting (Hillyard et al., 1998; Vogel and Luck, 2000; David et al., 2011; Kappenman and Luck, 2011)
Error related negativity (ERN) 80–150 Individual error processing (Gehring et al., 2011, 2018; Wang et al., 2020)
P200
(or P2)
100–250 Early selective attention
Attentional and cognitive processing
Automatic orienting to stimuli (Crowley and Colrain, 2004; Pacheco et al., 2020)
N200(or N2) 180–300 Conflict detection during the regulation of successful behavior (Donkers and van Boxtel, 2004; Folstein and Van Petten, 2007; Riesel et al., 2017; Heidlmayr et al., 2020)
Early posterior negativity (EPN) 200–300 Valence processing
Stimulus arousal
Attention allocation (Junghofer et al., 2001; Schupp et al., 2003a,b, 2007; Farkas et al., 2020; Hajcak and Foti, 2020; Lemos et al., 2020)
P300
(or P3)
250–500 Measure of attention independently of behavioral responding
Visual attention toward stimuli with personal relevance
Emotional salience (positive or negative)
Working memory update
Motivated attention (Polich, 2007, 2011; Lobo et al., 2014; Hajcak and Foti, 2020)
N400 (or N4) 250–500 Processes indexing access to semantic memory (Kutas and Federmeier, 2011)
Late positive potential (LPP) 300–1,000 Conscious allocation of attention
Allocation of motivational or emotion-based attention (Hajcak et al., 2010; Brown et al., 2012; Hajcak and Foti, 2020)
Slow positive wave (SPW) 500-6,000 Categorization and response selection processes (Johnston et al., 1986; daSilva et al., 2016)