Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;9(4):e26161. doi: 10.2196/26161

Table 2.

Study outcomes.

Author Sample size, n Intervention group, n Control group, n Events (intervention), n (%) Events (control), n (%) Odds ratio (95% CI)
Nonpatch studies

Liu et al, 2010 [23] 92 a 39 (42.4) 27 (29.2) 1.77 (0.96-3.26)

Hendrikx et al, 2014 [26] 95 9 (9.5) 2 (2.1) 4.87 (1.02-23.16)

Kimura et al, 2016 [27] 28 15 (53.6) 6 (21.4) 4.23 (1.31-13.62)

Busch et al, 2017 [28] 1678 42 (2.6) 21 (1.3) 2.03 (1.19-3.44)

Halcox et al, 2017 [29] 1001 500 501 19 (3.8) 5 (1.0) 3.92 (1.45-10.58)

Hickey et al, 2017 [30] 46 23 23 14 (60.9) 7 (30.4) 3.56 (1.05-12.05)

Narasimha et al, 2018 [31] 33 6 (18.2) 3 (9.1) 2.22 (0.51-9.76)

Reed et al, 2019 [19] 240 124 116 9 (7.3) 0 (0) 19.16b (1.10-333.12)

Goldenthal et al, 2019 [32] 238 115 123 58 (50.4) 49 (41.5) 1.54 (0.92-2.57)
Patch studies

Rosenberg et al, 2013 [24] 74 38 (51.3) 21 (28.4) 2.66 (1.35-5.26)

Barrett et al, 2013 [25] 146 41 (28.1) 27 (18.5) 1.72 (0.99-2.99)

Reed et al, 2018 [18] 689 86 603 2 (2.3) 0 (0) 35.71b (1.70-750.18)

Karunadas et al, 2019 [33] 141 3 (2.1) 3 (2.1) 1.00 (0.20-5.04)

Kaura et al, 2019 [34] 116 56 60 7 (16.3) 1 (2.1) 8.43 (1.00-70.87)

aNot applicable.

bHaldane correction applied.