Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;156(7):601–610. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1555

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.

Characteristics Transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy, No. (%)
With intrathoracic anastomosis (n = 122) With cervical anastomosis (n = 123)
Age, median (interquartile range), y 67 (5.1) 68 (9.2)
Male 98 (80.3) 92 (74.8)
Female 24 (19.7) 31 (25.2)
American Society of Anesthesiologists classification
1 12 (10.2) 14 (11.7)
2 80 (67.8) 83 (69.2)
3 25 (21.2) 23 (19.2)
4 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0)
Charlson Comorbidity Index score
0 81 (66.4) 80 (65.0)
1 22 (18.0) 21 (17.1)
2 9 (7.4) 10 (8.1)
3 7 (5.7) 7 (5.7)
4 2 (1.6) 2 (1.6)
5 0 2 (1.6)
6 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8)
7 0 0
Tumor type
Adenocarcinoma 105 (86.1) 114 (92.3)
Squamous cell carcinoma 12 (9.8) 7 (5.7)
Other 5 (4.1) 2 (1.6)
Tumor location
Intrathoracic midesophagus 6 (4.9) 3 (2.4)
Intrathoracic distal esophagus 105 (86.1) 106 (86.2)
Gastroesophageal junction 11 (9.0) 14 (11.4)
cT stage
T1 2 (1.6) 4 (3.2)
T2 23 (18.9) 19 (15.4)
T3 68 (55.7) 65 (52.8)
T4 1 (0.8) 2 (1.6)
Tx 28 (23.0) 33 (26.8)
cN stage
N0 53 (43.4) 60 (48.8)
N1 45 (36.9) 39 (31.7)
N2 16 (13.1) 19 (15.4)
N3 3 (2.5) 1 (0.8)
N+ 3 (2.5) 3 (2.4)
Nx 2 (1.6) 1 (0.8)
Neoadjuvant treatment
Yes
Chemoradiotherapy 118 (96.7) 117 (95.1)
Chemotherapy 2 (1.6) 3 (2.4)
None 2 (1.6) 3 (2.4)
Operation type
Total minimally invasive esophagectomy 97 (79.5) 100 (81.3)
Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy 25 (20.5) 23 (18.7)
Configuration of anastomosis
End to end 3 (2.5) 46 (37.4)
End to side 42 (34.4) 2 (1.6)
Side to side 77 (63.1) 75 (61.0)
Anastomosis technique
Handsewn 4 (3.3) 108 (87.8)
Stapled 118 (96.7) 15 (12.2)