Table 3.
Negative binomial regression analysis for variables predicting quantity-frequency of students’ past 30-days cigarette and cigar/cigarillo use (N = 984)
| Variable | Cigarette use |
Cigar/cigarillo use |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 1 |
||||||
| W | AA | MA | AA | MA | W | AA | MA | |
| Gender (male = 1) | .10 | .77*** | .82*** | 2.39*** | 1.19*** | 2.11*** | ||
| Discrimination | .01 | .02*** | .01 | .09*** | .03*** | −.02 | ||
| Pos. rel. coping | −.07*** | −.02 | −.01 | −.12*** | −.07 | −.06 | ||
| Neg. rel. coping | .07* | −.02 | −.04 | .14*** | .19*** | .001 | ||
| Discrim × PRC | .01* | |||||||
| Discrim × NRC | −.01* | |||||||
W White; AA African American; MA Mexican American; Discrim Discrimination; PRC positive religious coping; NRC negative religious coping. Because all non-significant interactions were omitted, model 2 for cigar/cigarillo use is not shown
P < .05;
P < .01;
P < .001