Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 7;26(3):140–148. doi: 10.1159/000509202

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and in the rightmost 3 columns the effect of single-electrode stimulation

Patient number Male/female Age, years Aetiology of hearing loss THI THQ Implant type Overall anamnestic effect of CI on tinnitus Tinnitus reductiona No effecta Tinnitus increasea
1 Female 62 Unknown 12 26 Cochlear No effect 4 5 1
2 Male 74 Otosclerosis 33 20 Cochlear No effect 0 8 0
3 Male 78 Unknown 46 85 Cochlear Reduction 0 12 0
4 Male 53 Congenital 60 68 Cochlear Reduction 3 9 0
5 Male 69 Unknown 30 53 Advanced bionics Reduction 10 2 0
6 Male 59 Unknown 22 14 Cochlear Reduction 1 10 1
7 Male 70 Unknown 0 6 Advanced bionics No effect 0 12 0
8 Female 46 Meniere's disease 46 76 Cochlear Reduction 8 4 0
9 Female 65 Otosclerosis 0 22 Cochlear Increase 1 2 9
10 Male 64 Familiar 36 41 Cochlear Increase 0 12 0
11 Female 69 Familiar 40 61 Advanced bionics Increase 9 0 3
12 Male 47 Meningitis 0 0 Cochlear Reduction 2 7 3
13 Female 45 Unknown 22 26 Cochlear Increase 0 10 2
14 Male 43 Otosclerosis 42 57 Cochlear No effect 1 11 0
15 Male 68 Skull base fracture 12 37 Advanced bionics No effect 6 6 0
16 Female 59 Otitis 68 59 Cochlear No effect 3 9 0
17 Male 57 ISSHL 4 11 Cochlear No effect 0 12 0
18 Female 69 Unknown 0 0 Cochlear Onset 4 2 6
19 Male 55 Unknown 66 71 Cochlear No effect 2 3 7

Mean 60.6 28.4 38.6 2.8 7.2 1.7

Range 43–78 0–68 0–85 0–10 0–12 0–9

Patients 1 and 2 did not complete the entire experiment. THI, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; THQ, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire; CI, cochlear implant.

a

Number of conditions with the indicated effect of single-electrode stimulation.