Table 3.
Association of riboflavin, vitamin C and zinc and RMR/FFM among obese women
| RMR/FFM | β | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | |||
| Crude model | 1.59 | 4.93 (1.04–23.26) | 0.04 |
| Model 1 | 1.75 | 5.80 (1.21–27.77) | 0.02 |
| Model 2 | 1.71 | 5.55 (1.11–27.59) | 0.03 |
| Model 3 | 1.52 | 4.58 (0.91–23.04) | 0.06 |
| Vitamin C | |||
| Crude model | 0.75 | 2.13 (0.95–4.77) | 0.06 |
| Model 1 | 0.82 | 2.27 (1.01–5.13) | 0.04 |
| Model 2 | 0.79 | 2.20 (0.93–5.19) | 0.07 |
| Model 3 | 0.48 | 1.62 (0.66–3.96) | 0.28 |
| Zinc | |||
| Crude model | 0.78 | 2.19 (1.04–4.61) | 0.03 |
| Model 1 | 0.71 | 2.04 (0.96–4.33) | 0.06 |
| Model 2 | 0.71 | 2.04 (0.87–4.76) | 0.09 |
| Model 3 | 0.66 | 1.95 (0.78–4.86) | 0.15 |
Bold value reflect significant value, P-value < 0.05
Model 1: adjusted for age. Model 2: further adjusted for energy intake. Model 3: further adjusted for physical activity (METs/day)
P-values are from binary logistic regression