Table 11.
Comparison of NUVA results with two key studies in the literature that have used ASR to assess spoken naming attempts in aphasia.
| Study | Abad et al. 2013 | Ballard et al. 2019 | NUVA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Portuguese | Australian English | British English |
| Population | Aphasia | Aphasia/Apraxia | Aphasia |
| N | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| Stimuli | 103 | 124 | 220 |
| Word Productions | 824 | 7069 | 1760 |
| Interrater Reliability Agreement (method) | >0.85 (point-to-point agreement) | 0.96 (point-to-point agreement) | 0.938 (Gwet's AC1) |
| Accuracy | 0.820 | 0.75 | 0.895 |
| Min | 0.690 | 0.651 | 0.836 |
| Max | 0.930 | 0.828 | 0.936 |
| Range | 0.240 | 0.177 | 0.100 |
| Evaluation Method | 10-Fold CV | Online | 10-Fold CV |