Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;11(2):207–215. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_443_20

Table 4.

Comparison and correlation of the domain and total scores in subjects with different self-rated ACs of the IOTN scores and POS scores using one-way ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation

IOTN-AC scores Dental Self- Confidence Social impact Psychological impact Aesthetic Concern PIDAQ total POS scores Dental Self- Confidence Social impact Psychological impact Aesthetic Concern PIDAQ total
Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE)
1–4 (n = 240) 19.00 (0.362) 17.07 (0.463) 16.04 (5.488) 6.45 (0.220) 58.55 (1.119) 0–1 (n = 73) 16.55 (0.626) 15.10 (0.658) 14.23 (0.558) 5.34 (0.332) 51.22 (1.589)
5–7 (n = 28) 23.36 (0.884) 21.21 (1.479) 18.86 (1.028) 7.82 (0.807) 71.25 (3.495) 2–4 (n = 42) 18.17 (0.812) 17.71 (1.075) 16.29 (0.890) 6.79 (0.512) 58.95 (2.623)
8–10 (n = 17) 21.18 (1.158) 20.59 (1.881) 18.53 (1.295) 8.65 (0.737) 68.94 (3.822) 5–8 (n = 86) ≥ 9 (n = 84) 20.28 (0.585) 22.12 (0.531) 17.99 (0.871) 19.62 (0.837) 17.27 (0.657) 17.68 (0.540) 7.07 (0.405) 7.50 (0.398) 62.60 (2.127) 66.92 (1.775)
F 8.728** 5.505* 4.598* 4.744* 8.880** F 8.728** 5.505* 4.598* 4.744* 8.880**
Spearman’s correlation 0.319** 0.215** 0.261** 0.191** 0.317** Spearman’s correlation 0.398** 0.231** 0.252** 0.243** 0.354**

SE: Standard Error, F: statistics and level of significance

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.001