Skip to main content
. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251326

Table 3. Results of included studies.

Study; year; country of sample N5 Identified
Risk factors or protective factors
Instruments measuring factors Risk (95% CI)
adjusted
Risk (95-% CI) unadjusted Risk type Type
Of multivariate
analysis
Quality rating; scores Depression in the past excluded Variables adjusted for
Ibadan Study of Ageing; 2011; Nigeria
[18]
892 Men
-
Women
Rural residence
No Regular contact with friends

Rural classified as <12000 households
CIDI

2.5 (1.4–4.4)
2.1 (1.1–3.7)
Unadjusted results not provided for men/women separately OR LR High;14/16 yes Age
Sex
Ibadan Study of Ageing; 2018; Nigeria [19] 1394 MenOccupational attainment (reference: skilled)
    • Trade

    • Elementary
WomenRural residenceNo regular contacts with family

Self-report, categorised based on International standard classification of occupations
Rural classified as <12000 households
CIDI

1.4 (1.0–2.0)
1.5 (1.1–2.1)
1.3 (1.0–1.7)
2.2 (1.0–4.7)

1.4(1.0–2.0)
1.5(1.1–2.1)
1.3(1.0–1.7)
2.2(1.0–4.7)
HR CRM High;14/16 yes Age
Aichi Gerontological Evaluation Study (AGES) project; 2019; Japan [20] 3464 Men:
1 or more life events
Age
Poorer self-reported health
Protective factors:
Having hobbies
Sense of coherence: medium
Sense of coherence: high
Women:
1 or more life events
Age old-old (compared to young-old)
Protective factors
Sense of coherence: high
Sense of coherence: no response

Question “did you experience any of the following events: (…)”
13-item Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13)
Question “did you experience any of the following events: (…)”
13-item Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13)

1.64 (1.22–2.19)
1.33 (0.96–1.86)
1,92 (1.35–2.78)
0.59 (0,40–0,86)
0.58 (0.41–0.82)
0.24 (0.16–0.35(
1.49 (1.11–2.01)
1.55 (1.11–2.15)
0.35(0,23–0,52)
0.44 (0.26–0.75)
Unadjusted results not provided OR GLM Medium;13/16 no Frequency of meeting friends
Emotional support: Receiving + providing
Instrumental support Receiving + providing
Hobbies (yes/no)
Participation in organization
Life events
Illness
Self-reported health
IADL
Sense of coherence
Age
Marital status
Educational level
Equivalent income
(all variables dichotomous)
The Tsurugaya Project; 2005; Japan; [21] 475
Not having someone with whom one can consult in trouble
Not having someone who can take care of you when you are ill in bed

Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no

2.6 (1.2–5.3)
3.0 (1.4–6.1)
Results adjusted for sex, age:
2.8(1.5–5.2)
2.9(1.6–5.3)
OR LR High;14/16 no Sex
Age
Presence/absence of spouse
Numbers of people in household
History of physical disease
Age at finishing education
Cognitive function
Physical function
Level of pain
Self-rated health
GDS-score at baseline
The JAGES prospective cohort study; 2016; Japan [22] 10458
Low Childhood Socioeconomic status
Low Annual household income

Question to participants arranged at 5-point Likert scale
Question: < 2 million yen

1.27 (1.08–1.50)
1.32 (1.08–1.60)
Adjusted for age and sex:
1.44(1.23–1.69)
-
ARR BR Medium;12/16 no Age
Sex
Childhood socioeconomic status
Education (High, middle, low)
Adult socioeconomic status: longest occupation (non-manual, manual, no occupation)
Annual household income (high, middle low)
Living situation (Own home, Rent home, Other)
Disease status
Health behaviours (smoking, alcohol, walking time)
Social relationships
(marital status, employment status, social participation, social support, general trust)
Municipality of residence
Obu Study of Health Promotion in the elderly; 2018; Japan [23] 3106 PROTECTIVE FACTORS
Light physical exercise
Taking enrichment lessons
Using personal computer
Participation in events at the community Centre
Attending a community meeting
Predictive Factors
No light physical exercise
Not taking enrichment lessons
Not using a personal computer
No participation in events at the community Centre
Not attending a community meeting

Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no
Question: yes/no

0.74(0.56–0.98)
0.62 (0.46–0.85)
0.68 (0.48–0.97)
0.54 (0.40–0.72)
0.69 (0.52–0.92)
1.35 (1.02–1.79)
1.61 (1.18–2.17)
1.47 (1.03–2.08)
1.85 (1.39–2,50)
1.45 (1.09–1.92)

0.62 (0.48–0.81)
0.50 (0.38–0.67)
0.51 (0.37–0.69)
0.41 (0.31–0.54)
0.52 (0.39–0.67)
1.61 (1,23–2,08)
2.00(1.49–2.63)
1.96(1.44–2.70)
2.44(1,85–3,22)
1.92(1,49–2.56)
OR MLR High; 15/16 yes Age,
Gender,
Education,
Current smoking status,
Alcohol consumption
Living status
Self-rated health
Scores on MMSE
Score on SPPB
Total number of medication doses
GDS at baseline
Obu study of Health Promotion for the Elderly; 2015; Japan [24] 3025
Poor self-rated general health
Frailty

Question: “How good was your health”
Limitations in physical tests in 5 Domains (mobility, strength, endurance, physical activity, weight loss)

1.86 (1.30–2.66)
1.86 (1.05–3.28)
Adjusted for Sex + Age:
3.27(2.35–4.55)
Not given
Unadjusted results not provided
OR MLR High; 15/16 yes Age
Sex
Education
Self-rated general health
Fear of falling
Smoking status
Alcohol
MMSE
SPPB
Frailty status
GDS score at baseline
Obu study of Health Promotion for the Elderly; 2016; Japan [25] 3066
Gait speed slower than 1.0 m/s
Sedentary behaviour time per day
240–480 minutes
> = 480 minutes
Using sleep medication

6.4 m walkway at participants usual gait speed, gait time measured between 2.0–4.4 m
Self-report: International Activity Questionnaire
Not specified

1.95 (1.25–3.04)
1.60 (1.09–2.38)
1.64 (1.02–2.64)
1.94 (1.40–2.67)
Adjusted for Sex + Age:
2.08(1.34–3.22)
1.59(1.08–2.34)
1.72(1.08–2.75)
1.98(1.44–2.72)
Unadjusted results not given
OR MLR High;15/16 yes Age
Sex
Educational history
Current smoking status
Current alcohol consumption
Living arrangements
Habit of going out
General cognition
Mobility
Sedentary behaviour time
Household and locomotive activities time
Survey of Health and Living Status of the Elderly in Taiwan; 2010; Taiwan [26] 1487 Female Sex
Change of variables between baseline and follow up as independent variables:
Worse perceived health stress
Worse perceived financial stress
Worse Life satisfaction
Worse Functional condition

Self-rated scale
Self-rated scale
Life Satisfaction Index (LSI-A)
ADL and IADL
1.58 (1.14–2.19)
3.06 (2.21–4.24)
2.02 (1.41–2.89)
1.92 (1.29–2.84)
2.39 (1.72–3.33)
Unadjusted results not provided OR Multivariate regression analysis Medium; 13/16
no Sex
Age
Education
Marital status
Ethnicity
Occurence of new disease
Perceived health stress
Perceived financial stress
Instrumental social support
Emotional social support
Life satisfaction
Functional condition
Yang et al.;
2015; Taiwan
[27]
1467 Ongoing heart disease
Worsening ADL2
Worsening IADL
Ongoing Arthritis or rheumatism
Not specified
ADL-Scale
Six items from older OARS IADL-survey
Not specified
1.64(1.17–2.30)
1.80(1.28–2.52)
1.86(1.25–2.75)
1.50(1.08–2.09)
1.75(1.28–2.40)
2.08(1.55–2.79)
2.20(1.53–3.16)
1.67(1.22–2.29)
OR LR Medium; 12/16 no Sex
Age
ADL change
IADL chage
Mobility change
Perceived health status
Comorbidities
Kim et al 2006; South Korea [28] 521 Pre-existing heart disease
Lower HDL cholesterol
Self-reported
Assay of blood sample
2.2 (1.3–3.7)
1.3 (1.1–1.6)
2.1(1.3–3.3)
No information
OR MLR High;14/16 No information Age
Gender
Education
Level of disability
Lyness et al.; 2009; USA [29] 405 Minor or subsyndromal depression at baseline
Physical Self-Maintenance Scale total score >0
History of major or minor depression
Other psychiatric disorder
SCID (DSM-IV)
Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (higher scale indicates poorer functioning)
SCID (DSM-IV)
SCID (DSM-IV) of any current alcohol-related or anxiety disorder
2.86 (1.33–6.15)
2.86 (1.19–6.84)
2.47 (1.12–5.44)
2.67 (1.22–5.86)
Unadjusted results not provided IRR GLMLG Lower; 8/16 no Not specified
Health and Retirement Study; 2019; USA [30] 4914 Insomnia symptoms (vs. no symptoms)
2 symptoms
3 symptoms
4 symptoms
Protective factors
White race/Caucasian (vs. black/African American, other)
Participating in physical activity
Years of education
Question: How often do you have trouble 1) Falling asleep 2) Waking up during night 3) Waking up to early 4) How often do you feel rested in the morning
Question
Question: yes or no
No information

2.80 (1.48–5.32)
4.44 (2.42–8.15)
6.74 (3.70–12.29)
0.72 (0.54–0.98)
0.51 (0.37–0.71)
0.92 (0.89–0.96)
Unadjusted results not provided HR CPHA Medium;13/16 no Age
Sex
Race
BMI
Smoking
Alcohol
Physical activity
Years of education
The Vienna Transdanube Aging study (VITA); 2009; Austria [31] 331 Score on Fuld Object Memory Evaluation (cognitive function)
Protective factors
“troubles with relatives”
Fuld Object Memory Evaluation 0.90 (0.88–0.99)
0.5 (0.28–0.89) p = 0.18
Unadjusted results not provided OR SMOLR Medium; 11/16 yes Not specified
ESPRIT study of neuropsychiatric disorders in French elderly; 2010; France [32] 1131
MEN
Low LDL-C levels at bl
WOMEN
-

Venous blood sample, determined by Friedwald formula

1.98 (1.06–3.72)
Adjusted for educational level
1.90 (1.25–2.89)
HR MCM Medium; 12/16 No, but adjusted for history of depression Age
Education level
Marital status
Cognitive impairment
BMI
Mobility
Ischemic pathologies
Hypertension
Diabetes
Alcohol and tobacco intect
Recent loss of appetite
Apo”
History of psychiatric disorder
ESPRIT study of neuropsychiatric disorders in French elderly; 2015; France [14] 415
(only women)
WOMEN
Homozygotes for minor Allele of GPR50-Polymorphism rs561077:AA

Buccal samples, Genotyping by LGC Genomics

1.77 (1.18–2.67)
Unadjusted results not provided HR CPHA with delayed entry Medium;12/16 no Age
Education
MMSE
Incapacities, Cardiovascular ischemic pathologies
Current anxiety disorders
The French Three City study; 2013; France; [33] 2307 2-year decrease in distance visual function Self-report; switching between, from without difficulties to at least “with difficulties” or from “with difficulties” to “unable” from baseline to 2 year follow-up 3.03 (1.75–5.23) Unadjusted results not provided OR MLM High; 14/16 no Study Centre
Age
Gender
Time since baseline
Income
Living alone
Ischemic pathologies
Diabetes
Respiratory diseases
Number of medications
Obesity
Mobility impairment
Cognitive impairment
falls
The French Three-City study; 2011; France [34] 3824 Insomnia symptoms
Sleep quality
    • Average
    • Poor
Difficulty initiating sleep
    • Frequently
    • Often
Difficulty maintaining sleep
    • Frequently
    • Often
Early Morning Awakening
    • Rarely
    • Frequently
    • Often
Number of Insomnia symptoms
    • 2
    • 3–4
Prescribed sleep medication
Face-to face interview; sleep-questionnaire
Self-report + control of medication/recipe by interviewer/ drug inventory
1.27 (1.05–1.54)
1.62 (1.32–1.98)
1.71(1.26–2.32)
1.65(1.19–2.28)
1.88(1.35–2.62)
1.63(1.01–2.62)
1.92(1.18–3.13)
1.31(1.01–1.70)
1.55(1.14–2.09)
1.58(1.16–2.15)
1.56(1.15–2.11)
1.75(1.28–2.40)
1.71(1.33–2.20)
1.81 (1.52–2.16)
2.14 (1.77–2.58)
3.16(2.40–4.14)
2.33 (1.74–3.12)
3.56(2.64–4.81)
1.96(1.25–3.07)
2.66(1.68–4.22)
1.155(1.26–1.90)
2.22(1.67–2.94)
3.17(2.06–4.88)
2.24(1.70–2.96)
3.03 (2.28–4.02)
Unadjusted result not provided
OR LR High;14/16 no Study Centre
CES-D at baseline
Gender
Age
Education
Living alone
Coffee consumption
Alcohol consumption
Smoking
Chronic disease
Past Major depression
Disability
Prescribed sleep medication intake
Homeopathic and non-prescription treatments for sleep
AMSTEL; 2000; Netherlands [35] 1940 Loss of spouse
Personal history of disorder
IADL decrease (>1pt)
Baseline IADL disability
New chronic disease
Baseline chronic disease

CAMDEX-interview
IADL
IADL
not specified
not specified
3.11 (2.10–4.60)
1.75 (1.26–2.43)
1.71 (1.28–2.27)
1.44 (1.10–1.90)
1.41 (1.05–1.90)
1.40 (1.08–1.80)
2.30(1.19–1.80)
1.61(1.25–2.06)
1.73(1.39–2.14)
1.55(1.26–1.92)
1.40(1.11–1.77)
1.46(1.19–1.80)
RR SLR Medium;14/16 no Age
Sex
Education
social support
Personal history of depression
Family history of depression
Chronic diseases
ADL disability
IADL disability
MMSE<26
Anxiety syndrome
New organic syndrome
New Anxiety syndrome
Changes between bl and follow-up:
Partner died
Relocation
All ADL decrease
All IADL decrease
New chronic diseases
AMSTEL; 2006; Netherlands; [36] 1915 Loss of spouse
Recent IADL decrease
Baseline IADL disability
Chronic illness at bl
Interview
IADL
IADL
interview
2.93 (1.93–4.47)
1.53 (1.12–2.10)
1.78 (1.28–2.48)
1.45 (1.10–1.91)
Unadjusted results not provided OR MLR High;15/16 no Age
Sex
Education
Marital status
Social support
Personal history of depression
Family history of psychiatric disorder
Baseline chronic diseases
Baseline ADL disability
Baseline IADL disability
Low MMSE(<26)
Life events
German Study on Ageing, Cognition, Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe Study); 2013; Germany [2] 2512 Age (85+)
Mobility impairment
Vision impairment
MCI
Subjective memory impairment
Current smoking

SIDAM-ADL-Scale1
SIDAM-ADL-Scale1
Consensus criteria by the International Working Group on mild cognitive Impairment
Question
Self-report
1.83 (1.24–2.70)
2.53 (1.97–3.25)
1.41 (1.04–1.91)
1.52 (1.10–2.10)
1.33 (1.01–1.74)
1.69 (1.13–2.53)
2.11(1.47–3.03)
2.91(2.31–3.66)
1.65(1.23–2.21)
1.68(1.25–2.24)
1.54(1.20–1.96)
1.69(1.13–2.53)
HR
CPHR High;16/16 no Sex
Age
Living alone
Marital status
Level of education
Mobility impairment
Vision impairment
Hearing impairment
IADL impairment
Somatic comorbidity
Mild cognitive impairment
Subjective memory impairment
Current alcohol consumption
Current smoking
apoE4
LEILA 75+.; 2012; Germany [37] 1265 Female gender
Satisfactory Self-rated health status (Functional Impairment)
Poor/very poor Self-rated health status (Functional Impairment)
Stroke in the past (comorbidity)
Risky alcohol consumption
Higher specialist visits
Protective factors
Higher social network score, pre point

IADL3 26 Item
IADL3 26 Item
Question
Self-report: g/day (= 20g w, 30g m)
Self-report last 12 months
Social Network Index, determined by the authors
2.93 (1.50–5.73)
2.60 (1.31–5.14)
2.64 (1.28–5.46)
2.78 (1.27–6.09)
2.33 (1.09–4.96)
1.61 (1.03–2.52)
0.84 (0.74–0.95)
Unadjusted results not provided HR CPHR High;14/16 no Age
Gender
Educational level
Marital status
Living situation (ref. alone)
Self-rated health status
ADL
MMSE
Myocardial infarction
Stroke
Specialist visits in last 12 months
Hospitalization in last 12 months
Stressful life events
Social network score
Alcohol consumption
Family history of mental illness (Impatient treatment of near relatives, suicide of relatives)
Evergreen Project; 2003; Finland [38] 384 Age

1.09(1.03–1.16)
Unadjusted results not provided OR LR High;14/16 no Mobilty groups
Physical activity groups
Gender
Age
Number of chronic illnesses
Length of education
GERDA Project; 2014; Finland [39] 115 Hypertension
History of stroke
GDS-15 Score at baseline
RR > = 160/95mmHg after 5min of Rest or treatment/previous diagnosis of hypertension
Medical records, report of patients/relatives
GDS-15
2.83 (1.08–7.42)
3.25 (1.12–9.44)
1.39 (1.09–1.76)
Unadjusted results not provided OR MLR Medium;11/16 no Age
Gender
Poor self-rated health
Taking Anxiolytics
History of stroke
Delirium during preceding month
Hypertension
Impaired hearing
GDS-score at bl
Number of medications
Kungsholmen project
2000; Sweden
[40]
894 History of depression/anxiety Medical records, examination of participants 4.8 (1.7–7.9) Unadjusted results not provided OR LR Medium;12/16 no Gender
Age>85
Education <8 years
Being immigrant
Marriage status
Being institutionalised
Using home care
Somatic illness
Dementia
Not feeling well
History of depression/anxiety
History of psychosis
Disabilitiees in daily life
Hearing disabilities
Visual impairment
No regular visitors
Having no friends
Being unsatisfied with social network
English longitudinal study of the Ageing (ELSA); 2008; [41] 2929 Visual impairment
Older Age
Female sex
No. of illnesses
Mobility impairment
IADL-Impairment
Current Smoker
Family negative interaction
Self-rated scale
Interview number of medical conditions in eight areas
Interview
Interview IADL-impairment
Interview
Interview 3-Items
1.66 (1.21–2.27)
1.30 (1.09–1.55)
1.42 (1.11–1.81)
1.18 (1.06–1.32)
1.48 (1.14–1.93)
1.52 (1.06–2.12)
1.50 (1.06–2.12)
1.14 (1.08–1.21)
Unadjusted results not provided OR MR Medium;11/16 no Visual impairment
Hearing impairment
Both visual and hearing impairment
Age
Sex
Marriage status
Education
Working status
Income
Number of medical conditions
Mobility impairment
ADL impairment
IADL impairment
Ex-smoker
Current smoker
Alcohol user
Family support
Family negative interactions
English Longitudinal Study of the Ageing (ELSA);2007; England [42] 2814 Older Age
Female Gender
Poor sight
Mobility disability
IADL disability
Current smoking
Negative interaction with family
Pain

Interview: fair, poor, or legally blind
Self-reported Difficulty in at least 1 of 5 activities
Self-reported Difficulty in at least 1 of 7 IADL activities
Self-reported, 3-Item Score
Question, moderate or severe pain
1.35 (1.13–1.61)
1.35 (1.06–1.71)
1.46 (1.12–1.90)
1.35 (1.03–1.78)
1.45 (1.10–1.91)
1.43 (1.03–1.96)
1.13 (1.07–1.20)
1.54 (1.19–2.00)
Unadjusted results not provided OR LR Medium;12/16 no Age
Gender
Education
Pain
Poor sight
Mobility disability
IADL disability
Current smokers
Negative interaction with family
Marriage status
Working status
Heart disease
Diabetes, stroke
Lung disease
Bone disease
Cancer
ADL disability
Two measures of social networks for family
income
Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE); 2019; Several Countries6 [43] 17067
Female gender
Poor self-rated health
Loneliness
Older Age
ADL-impairment
Financial difficulty
Cognition (<15)
Chronic diseases (> = 2)
Worse Education

Subjective rating of health
Short loneliness scale
ADL impairment in > = 1
interview
Specific items from SHARE Project assessed: immediate recall, delayed recall, subtraction calculation skills, verbal fluency
Heart disease, hypertension, cholesterol, stroke, diabetes, chronic lung disease, cancer, ulcer, Parkinson, fractures, dementia
Years of Schooling: Less than 10 years
99.9% CI
1.78 (1.77–1.78)
1.67 (1.66–1.67)
1.63 (1.62–1.64)
1.44 (1.43–1.44)
1.34 (1.34–1.35)
1.30 (1.30–1.31)
1.27 (1.27–2.28)
1.24 (1.23–1.24)
1.09 (1.09–1.10)
Unadjusted results not provided. OR MBLR High;14/16 no Gender
Self-rated health
Loneliness
Age
ADL impairment
Financial difficulty
Cognition
Chronic disease
Education
Nihon University Japanese Longitudinal Study of Aging: NUJLSOA; Japan
[44]
3065 Sleep disturbances: Difficulty initiating sleep
Psychological stress
Poor Self-Rated health
Self-reportet response to question (yes/no)
Self-report (Do you have psychological stress? Yes/no answer)
Self-report (How do you rate your present general health condition? Excellent/good/fair/poor/very poor)
1.592 (1.012–2.504)
1.553 (1.125–2.145)
2.517 (1.778–3.562)
2.042 (1.391–2.997)
1.846 (1.375–2.479)
2.589 (1.881–3.563)
OR MLR Medium; 12/16 no Age
Gender
Educational history
Place of residence
Sleep duration
Excessive daily sleepiness
Discomfort feeling in the legs
Subjective sleep sufficiency
Psychological stress
Self-rated health
ADL
Prospective community-based study of late-life psychiatric morbidity in Kwangju;
South Korea
[45]
792 Insomnia According to answers to questions: Difficulty in initiation or maintenance of sleep with a frequency of 3 nights or more per week.
1.8 (1.2–2.9) 1.7 (1.1–2.7) OR LR Medium 13/16 no Age
Gender
Education
Housing
Past occupation
Current employment
Living area
Life events
Social deficit
Physical activity
GMS organicity
GMS anxiety
Daily drinking

ARR = Adjusted Risk Ratio BMI = Body Mass Index; BR = Binomial Regression; CPHR = Cox proportional hazard regression; CPHA = Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis; CRM = Cox Regression Model; DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale; GLM: Generalized Linear Model; GLMLL: Generalized Linear Model with Logistic Link; GMSS = Geriatric Mental State Schedule; GMS-AGECAT = Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer Assisted Taxonomy- Geriatric Mental State Schedule; HAM-D = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HR = Hazard Ratio; IRR = Incident Risk Ratio; JAGES = Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study; Leila 75+ = Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Ageing; LR = Logistic regression; MADRS = Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale; MCM = Multivariate Cox Model; MINI = Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MBLR = Multivariate Binary logistic regression; MLM = Mixed logistic model; MLR: Multiple logistic regression/Multivariate Logistic Regression; MMSE = Mini Mental Status Examination; OR = Odds Ratio; RBDI = Finish modified version of Beck´s 13-item depression scale; RR = Relative Risk; SLR = Stepwise logistic regression; SMOLR = Stepwise Multiple Ordinal Logistic Regression; SCID = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; SLEs = Stressful life events; SPPB = Short Physical Performance Battery.

1Structured Interview for Diagnosis of Dementia of Alzheimer Type, Multi-infarct Dementia and Dementia of Other Etiology.

2Activities of Daily Living

3Instrumental Activities of Daily Living by Lawton and Brody, 1969

4Social network index according to Wenger and Tucker 2002

5number of participants included into the analysis

6Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Austria, Germany, Belgium, France, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Spain, Italy, Israel.