Skip to main content
. 2021 May 14;40(10):2191–2198. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04269-4

Table 3.

Overall analytical performances for saliva compared to nasopharyngeal specimens and by center and prevalence by center.

All centers Center 1 Center 2 Center 3 Center 4 Centers
1 + 3 + 4
Disease prevalence during study / 10,1% 12,5% 9,1% 7,4% /
Sensitivity (CI 95%) 87.8 (83.3–92.3) 92.2 (85.6–98.8) 66.7 (51.9–81.5) 96.8 (90.5–100.0) 91.5 (85.1–98.0) 92.8 (88.8–96.7)
Specificity (CI 95%) 97.1 (96.1–98.1) 97.7 (96.1–99.4) 97.2 (94.5–99.9) 94.8 (91.1–98.6) 97.3 (95.8–98.9) 97.1 (96.0–98.2)
PPV (CI 95%) 92.3 (88.6–96) 95.2 (89.8–100.0) 86.7 (74.5–98.8) 90.9 (81.1–100.0) 92.9 (86.8–98.9) 93.3 (89.5–97.1)
NPV (CI 95%) 97.8 (96.9–98.7) 99.0 (97.9–100.0) 91.4 (87.0–95.9) 99.2 (97.7–100.0) 98.8 (97.7–99.8) 98.9 (98.2–99.6)
Kappa (CI 95%) 0.84 (0.80–0.88) 0.89 (0.83–0.95) 0.70 (0.56–0.83) 0.85 (0.76–0.95) 0.86 (0.80–0.93) 0.87 (0.83–0.91)

NP nasopharyngeal; PPV positive predictive value; NPV negative predictive value