Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan;29(1):45–50. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0749

Table 4:

Correlation between measured MR imaging distance and cervical lymph node metastasis

MR Imaging Distance (mm) No. of Patients (%) by Presence of Metastases
Absent (n = 28) Present (n = 15)
Tumor thickness
    <8.3 15 (100) 0 (0)
    8.3–22.5 13 (52) 12 (48)
    >22.5 0 (0) 3 (100)
Sublingual distance
    0 8 (42) 11 (58)
    0–8.5 10 (71) 4 (29)
    >8.5 10 (100) 0 (0)
Paralingual distance
    <0 0 (0) 6 (100)
    0–5.3 8 (47) 9 (53)
    >5.3 20 (100) 0 (0)