Table 1.
Relations between weight suppression and participant characteristics.
| n (%) | WS, kg M (SD) | F or t | p | d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 261 (71.1%) | 3.60 (3.68) | 2.23 | 0.03 | 0.23 |
| Male | 103 (28.3%) | 6.20 (8.90) | |||
| Race | |||||
| Non-White | 76 (20.9%) | 4.25 (4.75) | 0.14 | 0.89 | 0.01 |
| White | 283 (77.7%) | 4.35 (6.03) | |||
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Hispanic | 40 (11.0%) | 6.94 (10.96) | 3.25 | 0.001 | 0.34 |
| Non-Hispanic | 320 (87.9%) | 3.91 (4.37) | |||
| Conditiona | |||||
| Project Health | 119 (32.7%) | 3.12 (3.44) | 5.21 | 0.006 | 0.34 |
| Healthy Weight | 122 (33.5%) | 5.33 (8.05) | |||
| Control | 123 (33.8%) | 4.54 (4.59) | |||
| M (SD) | Correlation with WS (r) | p-value | |||
| Age (years) | 19.10 (1.20) | 0.09 | 0.09 | ||
Note. WS = Weight suppression; WS was square-root transformed for analyses, but the untransformed M and SD are presented in this table. Race was collapsed into non-White and White due to small n’s for other individual racial categories.
a
Project Health < Healthy Weight (p = 0.01) and controls (p = 0.02).