Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;28(6):3243–3253. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09273-0

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics by radiological response group

Complete response MRI Partial response MRI Total
(n = 136) (n = 31) (n = 167)
Age 48 (42–56) 50 (43–56) 49 (42–56)
Clinical tumor stage
T1 32 (24%) 4 (13%) 36 (21%)
T2 87 (64%) 20 (65%) 107 (64%)
T3 17 (12%) 6 (19%) 23 (14%)
T4 0 1 (3%) 1 (1%)
Clinical nodal stage
N+ 68 (50%) 16 (52%) 84 (50%)
Imaging features
Multifocal 31 (23%) 9 (29%) 40 (24%)
Non-mass 27 (20%) 6 (19%) 33 (20%)
Calcifications 36 (27%) 9 (29%) 45 (27%)
Tumor size (mm) 27 (20–40) 27 (22–40) 27 (21–40)
Histology
Ductal 121 (89%) 25 (81%) 146 (88%)
Lobular 10 (7%) 4 (13%) 14 (8%)
Other 5 (4%) 2 (6%) 7 (4%)
Tumor subtype
HR +/HER2 - 32 (24%) 11 (35%) 43 (26%)
HR +/HER2 + 36 (26%) 5 (16%) 41 (24%)
HR -/HER2 + 21 (15%) 2 (7%) 23 (14%)
Triple-negative 47 (35%) 13 (42%) 60 (36%)
Tumor grade
Grade 1 7 (5%) 0 7 (4%)
Grade 2 41 (30%) 15 (48%) 56 (34%)
Grade 3 80 (59%) 15 (48%) 95 (57%)
Unknown 8 (6%) 1 (3%) 9 (5%)

Data are median (IQR) or n (%). All baseline characteristics were assessed before administration of neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Calcifications were assessed on mammography, other imaging features were assessed on MRI