Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;10(1):551–565. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00246-z

Table 3.

Key secondary outcomes

Group R Group RN Group RK
48-h Total morphine equivalent administered, median (98.3% CI) (mg)a, b 211.0 (209.5–216.0) 99.3 (97.0–101.3) 96.6 (94.5–99.0)
Difference, median (98.3% CI) (mg)
 Compared with group R NA 113.0 (109.5–116.0) 115.5 (112.0–119.0)
 P value P < 0.001 P < 0.001
 Compared with group RN NA NA 2.6 (0.0–5.4)
 P value P = 0.022c
 Compared with group RK NA NA NA
 P value
Additional rescue analgesia rates within 2 days post-surgery
POD-1 (98.3% CI) (%)d 46.3 (27.8–65.7) 11.9 (3.0–28.8) 14.6 (4.4–32.4)
Absolute difference (RR) [98.3% CI] (%)
 Compared with group R NA 34.4 (3.89) [12.4–56.5] 31.7 (3.17) [8.9–54.5]
 P value P = 0.001 P = 0.002
 Compared with group RN NA NA –2.7 (0.81) [–20.5 to 15.0]
 P value P = 0.72
 Compared with group RK NA NA NA
 P value
POD-2 (98.3% CI) (%)d 17.1 (5.8 to 35.3) 9.5 (1.9–25.7) 7.3 (1.0–22.9)
Absolute difference (RR) [98.3% CI] (%)
 Compared with group R NA 7.6 (1.79) [–10.2 to 25.3] 9.8 (2.33) [–7.3 to 26.8]
 P value P = 0.31e P = 0.18e
 Compared with group RN NA NA 2.2 (1.30) [–12.3 to 16.7]
 P value P = 0.72e
 Compared with group RK NA NA NA
 P value

NA not applicable, CI confidence interval, RR relative risk, POD postoperative day; R ropivacaine, RN ropivacaine + nalbuphine, RK ropivacaine + ketorolac

aTotal morphine equivalent is calculated as the sum of (sufentanil dose [μg] × 1) + morphine dose

bConfidence intervals were calculated by the Hodges-Lehmann estimator to determine the median difference. P values were calculated using Kruskal–Wallis test

cThis P value = 0.022 is above the prespecified threshold (level of significance) of P = 0.017

dThe 98.3% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using Clopper–Pearson method with binom.test

eFisher's exact test