Skip to main content
. 2021 May 14;15(7):1387–1395. doi: 10.1007/s11760-021-01869-7

Table 2.

Comparison between the engagement level of our proposed model and the state-of-the-art methods

Work Modality Classifier Engagement level Tasks Dataset description Engagement level accuracy (%)
[4] Emotions from facial expressions (one) SVM Very engaged, engaged in the task, nominally engaged, not engaged at all Set game 34 volunteers 72.9
Each volunteer sat in a private room
one session
[9] Emotions from facial expressions, eye gazes, and mouse behaviors (three) SVM High, medium, or low attention Reading task 6 volunteers 75.5
Three sessions with quiet and noisy environments
Our multimodal Emotions from facial expressions, mouse, and keyboard behaviors (three) Naive Bayes Strong, high, and medium engagements Writing task 42 volunteers 95.23
Each volunteer performs the writing task in different scenarios