Skip to main content
. 2021 May 13;11:10186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89463-2

Table 4.

Predictive performance of fluid responsiveness for PPV, SVV, PPV/driving-P, and PPV/Crs among the three PEEP levels.

PPV SVV PPV/driving-P PPV/Crs
PEEP 5
AUC 0.81 (0.61–0.93) 0.75 (0.55–0.90) 0.75 (0.55–0.90) 0.76 (0.55–0.90)
Cutoff 3.2 4.5 0.26 0.1
Sensitivity (%) 100 (79.4–100) 100 (79.4–100.0) 87.5 (61.7–98.4) 93.6 (69.8–99.8)
Specificity (%) 54.6 (23.4–83.3) 54.6 (23.4–83.3) 63.6 (30.8–89.1) 54.6 (23.4–83.3)
PEEP 10
AUC 0.67 (0.46–0.84) 0.79 (0.59–0.92) 0.72 (0.52–0.88) 0.67 (0.47–0.84)
Cutoff 4.6 10.4 0.42 0.15
Sensitivity (%) 75 (47.6–92.7) 50 (24.7–75.3) 62.5 (35.4–84.8) 68.8 (41.3–89.0)
Specificity (%) 63.6 (30.8–89.1) 100 (71.5–100) 81.8 (48.2–97.7) 63.6 (30.8–89.1)
PEEP 15
AUC 0.85 (0.66–0.96) 0.76 (0.55–0.90) 0.88 (0.69–0.97) 0.71 (0.50–0.86)
Cutoff 8.8 11.5 0.48 0.32
Sensitivity (%) 75 (47.6–92.7) 62.5 (35.4–84.8) 81.3 (54.5–96.0) 68.8 (41.3–89.0)
Specificity (%) 90.9 (58.7–99.8) 100 (71.5–100) 90.9 (58.7–99.8) 72.7 (39.0–94.0)

AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, PPV pulse pressure variation, SVV stroke volume variation, Crs respiratory system compliance.