Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;8:643966. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.643966

Table 2.

Analysis of oxygen saturation measured by a transmittance pulse oximeter probe placed on the tongue or by a reflectance pulse oximeter probe positioned on the tail or tibia in anesthetized dogs that had or had not received dexmedetomidine.

n SpO2 m (%) (min-max%) SpO2 m (%) (min-max%) P-value
Tongue vs. tail Tongue Tail
BUT 132 96 (90–100) 100 (89–100) <0.0001
DEX 100 97 (87–100) 99 (67–100) <0.0001
Tongue vs. tibia Tongue Tibia
BUT 92 96 (77–100) 100 (93–100) <0.0001
DEX 69 96.5 (82–100) 98.5 (70–100) 0.3366
Tail vs. tibia Tail Tibia
BUT 85 100 (93–100) 100 (74–100) 0.2003
DEX 49 97 (70–100) 99 (78–100) 0.0046

Values were only included if measurements for both positions were available and analyzed as paired values.

n, number of measurements; tongue, transmittance pulse oximeter probe placed on the tongue; tail, reflectance pulse oximeter probe placed on the ventral tail base; tibia, transmittance pulse oximeter probe placed on the medial aspect of the proximal tibia; SpO2, oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximeter; BUT, premedication butorphanol 0.2 mg/kg IV; DEX, premedication dexmedetomidine 5 μg/kg + butorphanol 0.2 mg/kg IV; m, median. Bold values mean significant differences.