Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;11(5):e02093. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2093

TABLE 1.

Contrast modeled in the monetary incentive delay task

Contrasts Phases of MID Modeled
Contrast 1 (A1) ‐ Ant Win (W; $5 & $0.20) > Neutral (N) (W > N)
Contrast 2 (A2) ‐ Ant Big Win (BW; $5) > Neutral (N) (BW > N)
Contrast 3 (A3) ‐ Ant Big Win (BW; $5) > Small Win (SW; ($0.20) (BW > SW)
Contrast 4 (A4) ‐ Ant Big Win (BW; $5) > Implicit Baseline (BW > IB)
Contrast 5 (A5) ‐ Ant Big Loss (BL; $5) > Neutral (N) (BL > N)
Contrast 6 (O6) – Out Big Win (BW; $5) Hit > Neutral (N) Hit (BWH > NH)
Contrast 7 (O7) – Out Big Loss (BW; $5) Hit > Neutral (N) Hit (BWH > NH)
Contrast 8 (P8) ‐ PE Expected Value – BW & SM Modulated (EV)
Contrast 9 (P9) ‐ PE Positive Prediction Error (PPE) ‐ BW & SM Modulated
Contrast 10 (P10) ‐ PE Negative Prediction Error (NPE) ‐ BL & SL Modulated

Ant = anticipation; Out = outcome; individual contrasts modeled in FSL, see section 1.3 in Supplementary for list of events modeled in GLM. A = anticipation; O = Outcome; PE = prediction error