Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;11(4):488–499. doi: 10.1177/2192568220912706

Table 3.

Factors Predictive of Improvement of Dysphagia and Complication Following Cheilectomy Using Univariate Analysis.

Improvement P OR CI, Lower 95% CI, Upper 95%
Age 75 years or less .04a 19.50 1.30 292.75
Exposure surgeon .60 2.00 0.21 18.69
BMI > 27.5 kg/m2 .58 3.43 0.29 40.95
Surgery at 3 or more levels 1.00 2.00 0.17 24.07
Severe dysphagia .18 0.12 0.01 1.53
Prior neck surgery .60 0.50 0.05 4.67
Fusion at time of cheilectomy .53 NAb NAb NAb
DISH .60 2.00 0.21 18.69
Osteophyte regrowth .18 0.15 0.01 1.80
Complication P OR CI, Lower 95% CI, Upper 95%
Age 75 years or less .60 0.37 0.05 3.01
Exposure surgeon .38 0.38 0.06 2.55
BMI > 27.5 kg/m2 .17 0.19 0.03 1.43
Surgery at 3 or more levels 1.00 1.05 0.16 6.92
Severe dysphagia .07 7.50 0.92 61.05
Prior neck surgery 1.00 1.05 0.16 6.92
Fusion at the time of cheilectomy .60 2.70 0.33 21.98
DISH 1.00 0.95 0.14 6.28
Osteophyte regrowth .60 0.38 0.03 4.55

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; DISH, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.

b Unable to calculate OR because all patients with fusion showed improvement.