Skip to main content
. 2021 May 13;12:2785. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22856-z

Fig. 1. Relationship between models and possible computations in cortical circuits, and proposed strategy for connectomic model distinction in local circuit modules of the cerebral cortex.

Fig. 1

a Relationship between computations suggested for local cortical circuits (left) and possible circuit-level implementations (right). Colored lines indicate successful performance in the tested computation; gray lines indicate failure to perform the computation (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for details). b Enumeration of candidate models possibly implemented in a barrel-circuit module. See text for details. c Flowchart of connectomic model selection approach to obtain the posterior p (m|C) over hypothesized models m given a connectome C. ABC-SMC: approximate Bayesian computation using sequential Monte–Carlo sampling. d Sketch of mouse primary somatosensory cortex with presumed circuit modules (“barrels”) in cortical input layer 4 (L4). Currently known constraints of pairwise connectivity and cell prevalence of excitatory (ExN) and inhibitory (IN) neurons (pee: pairwise excitatory-excitatory connectivity3033,36, pei: pairwise excitatory-inhibitory connectivity31,33, pii: pairwise inhibitory-inhibitory connectivity31,34, pie: pairwise inhibitory-excitatory connectivity31,33,35, ree: pairwise excitatory-excitatory reciprocity30,31,33).