Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;11(13):6214–6224. doi: 10.7150/thno.55676

Table 2.

Biomarker panels improving the specificity of AG PCa detection

AUC (95% CI) SN (%) SP (%) (p-value*) True-Neg True-Pos False-Neg False-Pos
AG vs Low Risk PCa
Panel-1 0.942 (0.876-1.000) 95.0 76.0 (0.029) 19 24 1 6
phi + Fuc-PSA 0.914 (0.828-0.980) 95.0 76.0 (0.013) 19 24 1 6
phi 0.872 (0.748-0.971) 95.0 56.0 14 24 1 11
PSA 0.866 (0.749-0.956) 95.0 44.0 11 24 1 14
AG vs Low Risk PCa & Non-PCa
Panel-2 0.934 (0.866-0.987) 95.0 78.2 (0.010) 43 24 1 12
phi + Fuc-PSA 0.918 (0.842-0.974) 95.0 69.1 (0.207) 38 24 1 17
phi 0.898 (0.814-0.963) 95.0 65.5 36 24 1 19
PSA 0.807 (0.697-0.905) 95.0 36.4 20 24 1 35

Note: PCa, prostate cancer; AG, aggressive PCa; Non-PCa, biopsy negative; Panel-1, phi + Fuc-PSA + SDC1 + GDF-15; Panel-2, phi + Fuc-PSA + SDC1 + Tie-2; AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; Neg, negative; Pos, positive. *, one-sided paired test comparing specificity against phi.