Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 2;8(3):2320–2327. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13276

Table 2.

Conventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography data of patients with giant cell myocarditis

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6
CMR parameters
LVEF (%) 29 28 42 23 13 23
RVEF (%) 15 16 31 18 26 26
LVMi (g/m2) 48.4 50.5 70.5 46.1 50.8 41
LVEDVi (mL/m2) 53.5 110 87 78.7 124.3 97.5
LVESVi (mL/m2) 37.7 79 49.8 60 107.5 74.7
RVEDVi (mL/m2) 97.4 84.7 63.9 157.3 68.5 83.1
RVESVi (mL/m2) 82 70.9 43.8 129 50.3 61.1
T2 ratio 2.6 2.3 3.6 3 1.8 1.9
LGE extent (%) 21.6 44.2 31.2 38.3 56 47
Echocardiography
RWMA POS POS POS POS POS POS
RVSP (mmHg) 26 39 37 24 44 56
Mitral valve E/A NA NA NA >2 NA >2
Valve abnormality Moderate TR Moderate MR and TR Mild MR and TR Severe MR Moderate MR, mild TR Moderate MR and TR
Pericardial involvement Small PE Small PE NI Small PE NI NI

CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LVEDVi, indexed left ventricular end‐diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESVi, indexed left ventricular end‐systolic volume; LVMi, indexed left ventricular mass; MR, mitral regurgitation; NA, not available; NI, not involved; PE, pericardial effusion; POS, positive: hypokinesia in one or more segments; RVEDVi, indexed right ventricular end‐diastolic volume; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; RVESVi, indexed right ventricular end‐systolic volume; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; RWMA, regional wall motion abnormality; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.