Table 3. CIDME by Manual Grading vs CMFV, CST, or DRCR.net study standard.
| Grading | Threshold, No./total No. (%) | Total No. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | ||
| CIDME by manual grading vs CMFV theshold, No./total No. (%) | |||
| 0 | 116/122 (95.1) | 6/122 (4.9) | 122 |
| 1 | 20/93 (21.5) | 73/93 (78.5) | 93 |
| Total No. | 136 | 79 | 215 |
| CIDME by manual grading vs CST threshold, No./total No. (%) | |||
| 0 | 116/122 (95.1) | 6/122 (4.9) | 122 |
| 1 | 43/93 (46.2) | 50/93 (53.8) | 93 |
| Total No. | 159 | 56 | 215 |
| CIDME by manual grading vs CST ≥320 μm in men or ≥305 μm in women, No./total No. (%)a | |||
| 0 | 110/122 (90.2) | 12/122 (9.8) | 122 |
| 1 | 37/93 (39.8) | 56/93 (60.2) | 93 |
| Total No. | 147 | 68 | 215 |
Abbreviations: CIMDE, center-involved diabetic macular edema; CMFV, central macular fluid volume; CST, central subfield thickness; DRCR.net, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.
a
CST of 320 μm or more in men or 305 μm or more in women is the standard for CIDME used in the DRCR.net study.21