Skip to main content
. 2021 May 13;20:106. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01292-9

Table 2.

Baseline parameters of cardiopulmonary capacity

CPET parameters DM (n = 266) nonDM (n = 516)
HCTR-DM
n = 129
UC-DM
n = 137
p1 HCTR-nonDM
n = 256
UC-nonDM
n = 260
p2
Exercise time (s) 338 ± 163 327 ± 163 0.602 420 ± 185 407 ± 188 0.427
VO2peak (ml/min/kg) 15.3 ± 4.5 15.1 ± 5.1 0.821 18.1 ± 5.8 17.7 ± 6.3 0.417
VCO2peak (l/min) 1.29 ± 0.55 1.38 ± 0.58 0.193 1.56 ± 0.67 1.51 ± 0.69 0.389
Percent-predicted VO2 (%) 49.4 ± 17.9 47.0 ± 16.5 0.255 59.6 ± 20.7 58.7 ± 22.0 0.638
VAT (ml/kg/min): 13.6 ± 4.5 13.9 ± 5.5 0.634 15.9 ± 5.7 15.6 ± 5.8 0.651
Ventilation at rest (l/min) 13.0 ± 4.0 13.3 ± 4.6 0.568 12.8 ± 5.5 12.9 ± 4.1 0.897
Ventilation on peak exercise (l/min) 44.9 ± 16.0 47.5 ± 15.8 0.177 51.7 ± 18.8 50.4 ± 19.3 0.419
Breathing rate at rest(1/min) 18.8 ± 4.6 19.0 ± 4.9 0.684 18.7 ± 4.6 19.1 ± 5.1 0.372
Breathing rate on peak exercise (1/min) 28.8 ± 5.9 29.0 ± 5.7 0.826 29.6 ± 6.5 29.8 ± 6.8 0.731
VE/VO2 slope 28.4 ± 10.0 31.7 ± 13.4 0.029 31.0 ± 10.9 31.0 ± 11.1 0.994
VE/VCO2 slope 32.1 ± 9.7 31.8 ± 10.5 0.778 30.3 ± 9.7 29.3 ± 11.0 0.293

CPET Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, HCTR-DM patients in hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation arm with heart failure and diabetes, HCTR-nonDM patients in hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation arm with heart failure and without diabetes, VO2 peak peak oxygen uptake, UC-DM patients in usual care arm with heart failure and diabetes, UC-nonDM patients in usual care arm with heart failure and without diabetes, VAT ventilatory anaerobic threshold, VE/VCO2 slope slope of ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide

p1—p value for HCTR-DM vs. UC-DM, p2—p value for HCTR-nonDM vs. UC-nonDM