Table 6.
Multigroup analysis between low and high academic involvement group samples.
| Paths | Low Involvement β1 (n = 305) | R2 | High Involvement β2 (n = 172) | R2 | Difference in Beta | ΔR2 | P-Value for Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical System Quality → User Satisfaction | 0.118∗ | 0.104 | 0.072 | 0.251 | 0.046 | 0.147∗∗ | 0.412 |
| Information Quality → User Satisfaction | 0.129∗ | 0.168∗ | -0.039 | 0.735 | |||
| Educational System Quality → User Satisfaction | 0.036 | 0.170∗ | -0.134 | 0.074 | |||
| Service Quality → User Satisfaction | 0.208∗∗ | 0.309∗∗ | -0.101 | 0.397 | |||
| Technical System Quality → Intention to Use | 0.073 | 0.149 | 0.149∗ | 0.455 | -0.076 | 0.306∗∗ | 0.349 |
| Information Quality → Intention to Use | 0.073 | 0.183∗∗ | -0.110 | 0.118 | |||
| Educational System Quality → Intention to Use | 0.125∗ | 0.140∗ | -0.015 | 0.299 | |||
| Service Quality → Intention to Use | 0.292∗∗ | 0.367∗∗ | -0.075 | 0.152 | |||
| User Satisfaction → Intention to Use | 0.039 | 0.169∗∗ | -0.130 | 0.078 | |||
| Intention to Use → Net Benefits | 0.060 | 0.093 | 0.123 | 0.109 | -0.063 | 0.016 | 0.629 |
| User Satisfaction → Net Benefits | 0.290∗∗ | 0.255∗ | 0.035 | 0.850 |
Note: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 [∗, ∗∗ denotes the significant impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable at 5% and 1% significance level respectively].