Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;2021(3):CD013732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013732.pub2

Quinn 1992.

Study characteristics
Methods Single‐centre randomised double‐blind controlled trial
Participants 95 preterm newborns (57, excluding those receiving only morphine)
Entry criteria: newborns with hyaline membrane disease who were fighting against the ventilator (on clinical impression); postnatal age > 4 hours and < 48 hours; no prior treatment with narcotic analgesic or neuromuscular blocking agent
Interventions Morphine group (n = 29): 50 mcg/kg/hour by continuous infusion, increased to 100 mcg/kg/hour if the newborn was still struggling after 2 hours. Babies in this group were allowed to receive pancuronium if still fighting the ventilator after 4 hours (n = 7)
Pancuronium group (n = 28): 100 mcg/kg per dose given as required to inhibit breathing. Babies in this group were given morphine for painful procedures (n = 4)
Morphine + pancuronium group (n = 38): continuous morphine at 50 mcg/kg/hour + intermittent pancuronium at 100 mcg/kg as required; morphine not increased above 50 mcg/kg/hour
We extracted data from the morphine + pancuronium group and the pancuronium group (i.e. pancuronium was a co‐intervention); we did not include the group receiving only morphine
Drug therapy continued until FiO₂ < 0.45. 1 baby stopped treatment within 24 hours because FiO₂ fell below 0.45
Outcomes Catecholamines; plasma levels; blood pressure; heart rate; peak inspiratory pressure; FiO₂ on entry to the study and after 6 hours' treatment; days on ventilator; air leaks; intraventricular haemorrhage; PDA; death
5 to 6 years' follow‐up outcomes: IQ (by Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence); motor impairment (by Movement Assessment Battery for Children); behaviour problems (by Child Behaviour Checklist completed by a parent); blood thyroid‐stimulating hormone level
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Study authors stated that randomisation was performed by drawing a sealed envelope. These authors did not state how the list of randomisation was generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Allocation concealment was inadequate
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) High risk Blinding of interventions and outcomes was not clearly ensured
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) High risk Blinding of interventions and outcomes was not clearly ensured
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Unclear risk Clinical outcomes were reported for 28 of the 38 randomised infants to morphine and for 28 of 28 in the control group. Unclear if due to a typo in the manuscript or attrition bias. A power calculation was made for differences in catecholamine levels. Analysis of clinical data was performed on an intention‐to‐treat basis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Trial not registered; protocol not available
Other bias Low risk Study appears to be free of other sources of bias