Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;2021(3):CD013732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013732.pub2

Saarenmaa 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Single‐centre double‐blind randomised controlled trial
Participants 163 babies mechanically ventilated during the first day of life fulfilled study entry criteria: 24 weeks' or longer GA, estimated duration of MV ≥ 1 day, with indwelling arterial line
Exclusion criteria: chromosomal aberrations; major anomalies
Interventions Fentanyl group (n = 83): loading dose of 10.5 mcg/kg in 1 hour, followed by maintenance rate of 1.5 mcg/kg/hour for ≥ 24 hours
Morphine group (n = 80): loading dose of 140 mcg/kg in 1 hour, followed by maintenance dose of 20 mcg/kg/hour for ≥ 24 hours
Additional analgesia with opioid boluses was allowed. The bolus, equal to a 1‐hour maintenance infusion dose, could be given 4 times a day at the most. Muscle relaxation could be used if the infant was struggling against the ventilator despite analgesia
Outcomes Primary outcome (used for sample size calculation): gastrointestinal motility and urinary retention
Secondary outcomes: duration of MV; beginning of enteral feeding (days); duration of opioid infusion (hours); administration of opioid boluses; pancuronium relaxation; surfactant treatment; RDS; infection; PPHN; NEC; IVH (grades 3 + 4); mortality; severity of pain assessed with (i) physiological parameters (heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and oxygen saturation); (ii) behavioural pain responses before, during, and after tracheal suction assessed with a pain score adapted from the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale of the Children´s Hospital of East Ontario Pain Scale; (iii) stress hormone concentrations (noradrenaline, adrenaline, and beta‐endorphin) before and 2 and 24 hours after the start of treatment
Notes Power calculation was made on urinary retention and decreased gastrointestinal motility
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Infants were randomised in 5 blocks with closed envelopes. Sequence generation was not specified 
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Low risk Carers were blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Low risk Assessors were blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Low risk 2 infants in the fentanyl group did not receive the infusion; their data are included in an ITT analysis. Data on plasma catecholamine and endorphin levels were not available for all infants; however loss to follow‐up seems similar in the 2 groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Trial not registered; protocol not available
Other bias Low risk Study appears to be free of other sources of bias