Simons 2003.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial in 2 NICUs | |
Participants | 150 ventilated neonates Inclusion criteria: all neonates admitted to NICU who required mechanical ventilation; postnatal age < 3 days; ventilation < 8 hours Exclusion criteria: severe asphyxia; severe IVH; major congenital malformations; facial malformations; neurological disorders; continuous or intermittent treatment with neuromuscular blockers | |
Interventions | Morphine group (n = 73): loading dose 100 mcg/kg followed by 10 mcg/kg/hour continuous infusion Placebo group (n = 77): sodium chloride in 5% glucose Masked treatment was continued for 7 days or less (as for clinical conditions); after 7 days, study medication was weaned or stopped, or was replaced by open‐label morphine infusion During study period, additional morphine was allowed if patients from either group were judged to be in pain or distress based on decisions of the attending physician | |
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: pain response: PIPP, NIPS, and visual analogue scale at standardised time points
Secondary outcomes: incidence of all grades of IVH and poor neurological outcome (severe IVH, PVL, or death); duration of MV; length of NICU stay; incidence of comorbidity (chronic lung disease; sepsis; necrotising enterocolitis; PDA); number of painful procedures; MAP; administration of volume expanders and vasopressor drugs; number of infants with hypotensive MAP measurements as compared with "normal" values of BP; concentrations of adrenaline and noradrenaline in arterial blood plasma
Primary and secondary outcomes were measured during hospital stay and were reported by Simons 2003 and Simons 2005 Follow‐up outcomes:
|
|
Notes | Data on duration of ventilator days were presented for the first period (NICU stay) and as total duration of ventilator days during admission. Data from the first period were used for the meta‐analysis | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Method of randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation list to select 10 random permuted blocks stratified into 5 groups of gestational age ranges |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation concealment was ensured |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | Low risk | Blinding of caregivers was attained |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) | Low risk | Blinding of assessors was attained |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | There was no loss to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Trial not registered; protocol not available |
Other bias | Low risk | Study appears to be free of other sources of bias |