Table 3.
Summary of Studies Meeting and Adhering to HRQoL Criteria
| Criteria | Studies Meeting Criteria, n (%) |
|---|---|
| Did the investigator give a definition of quality of life? | 6 (7) |
| Did the investigators state the domains they will measure as components of quality of life? | 72 (88) |
| Did the investigators give reasons for choosing the instrument they used? | 13 (16) |
| Did the investigator aggregate results from multiple items, domains or instruments into a single composite score for quality of life? | 47 (57) |
| Were patients asked to give their own global rating for quality of life? | 5 (6) |
| Was overall quality of life distinguished from health-related quality of life? | 7 (9) |
| Were the patients invited to supplement the items listed in the instruments offered by the investigators that they considered relevant for their quality of life? | 0 (0) |
| If so, were these supplemental items incorporated into the final rating? | 0 (0) |
| Were patients allowed to indicate which items were personally important to them? | 1 (1) |
| If so, were the importance ratings incorporated into the final rating? | 0 (0) |
Note: Studies could be counted in more than one category.