Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;10:e62278. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62278

Appendix 1—table 14. Effect of the intervention on children with repeated observations at baseline and 12-month visit.

Prevalence Prevalence ratio
Baseline 12 month Unadjusted Adjusted†
Any bacterial or protozoan infection
Control 161/207 (78%) 187/207 (90%) .. ..
Intervention 174/228 (76%) 207/228 (91%) 1.02 (0.91–1.16), p=0.70 1.01 (0.90–1.14), p=0.84
Any STH infection
Control 67/132 (51%) 80/132 (61%) .. ..
Intervention 63/154 (41%) 91/154 (59%) 1.22 (0.92–1.61), p=0.17 1.16 (0.87–1.55), p=0.31
Diarrhea
Control 36/277 (13%) 17/277 (6.1%) .. ..
Intervention 42/279 (15%) 34/279 (12%) 1.71 (0.78–3.77), p=0.18 1.71 (0.79–3.70), p=0.17
Any Bacteria
Control 141/207 (68%) 165/207 (80%) .. ..
Intervention 142/228 (62%) 170/228 (75%) 1.02 (0.86–1.22), p=0.8 1.01 (0.85–1.20), p=0.92
Shigella
Control 89/207 (43%) 128/207 (62%)
Intervention 90/228 (39%) 142/228 (62%) 1.10 (0.86–1.39), p=0.45 1.08 (0.85–1.37), p=0.54
ETEC
Control 63/207 (30%) 83/207 (40%)
Intervention 71/228 (31%) 79/228 (35%) 0.84 (0.56–1.27), p=0.41 0.85 (0.57–1.28), p=0.44
Campylobacter
Control 20/207 (9.7%) 18/207 (8.7%)
Intervention 13/228 (5.7%) 18/228 (7.9%) 1.54 (0.62–3.80), p=0.35 1.49 (0.60–3.71), p=0.39
C. difficile
Control 15/207 (7.3%) 4/207 (1.9%)
Intervention 8/228 (3.5%) 3/228 (1.3%) 1.39 (0.24–8.00), p=0.71 1.45 (0.25–8.52), p=0.68
E. coli O157
Control 9/207 (4.3%) 15/207 (7.3%) .. ..
Intervention 9/228 (4.0%) 10/228 (4.4%) 0.67 (0.22–2.03), p=0.48 0.68 (0.22–2.06), p=0.49
STEC
Control 1/207 (0.48%) 6/207 (2.9%) .. ..
Intervention 6/228 (2.6%) 4/227 (1.8%) 0.11 (0.01–1.31), p=0.081 0.11 (0.01–1.32), p=0.082
Y. enterocolitica
Control 0/207 (0.0%) 0/207 (0.0%) .. ..
Intervention 1/228 (0.44%) 0/227 (0.0%) ..‡ ..‡
V. cholerae
Control 0/207 (0.0%) 0/207 (0.0%) .. ..
Intervention 0/228 (0.0%) 0/227 (0.0%) ..‡ ..‡
Any Protozoa
Control 109/207 (53%) 130/207 (63%) .. ..
Intervention 117/228 (51%) 166/228 (73%) 1.19 (0.95–1.48), p=0.13 1.18 (0.94–1.47), p=0.15
Giardia
Control 106/207 (51%) 130/207 (63%)
Intervention 113/228 (50%) 164/228 (72%) 1.18 (0.94–1.48), p=0.15 1.17 (0.93–1.47), p=0.17
Cryptosporidium
Control 6/207 (2.9%) 2/207 (0.97%) .. ..
Intervention 10/228 (4.4%) 5/227 (2.2%) 1.44 (0.21–9.82), p=0.71 1.45 (0.22–9.71), p=0.7
E. histolytica
Control 0/207 (0.0%) 0/207 (0.0) .. ..
Intervention 2/228 (0.88%) 7/228 (3.1%) ..‡ ..‡
Any virus
Control 27/207 (13%) 20/207 (9.7%) .. ..
Intervention 31/228 (14%) 25/228 (11%) 1.05 (0.50–2.22), p=0.89 1.08 (0.51–2.26), p=0.84
Norovirus GI/GII
Control 20/207 (9.7%) 19/207 (9.2%)
Intervention 23/228 (11%) 19/228 (8.3%) 0.83 (0.36–1.94), p=0.67 0.86 (0.37–1.99), p=0.72
Adenovirus 40/41
Control 7/207 (3.4%) 2/207 (0.97%) .. ..
Intervention 6/228 (2.6%) 6/228 (2.6%) 3.56 (0.46–27.24), p=0.22 3.59 (0.46–27.91), p=0.22
Rotavirus A
Control 1/207 (0.48%) 1/207 (0.48%) .. ..
Intervention 4/228 (1.8%) 1/228 (0.44%) ..‡ ..‡
Coinfection,≥2 GPP pathogens
Control 114/207 (55%) 135/207 (65%) .. ..
Intervention 115/228 (50%) 156/228 (68%) 1.15 (0.92–1.43), p=0.23 1.14 (0.91–1.42), p=0.25
Trichuris
Control 49/132 (37%) 64/132 (48%) .. ..
Intervention 53/154 (34%) 77/154 (50%) 1.12 (0.81–1.54), p=0.50 1.06 (0.76–1.48), p=0.72
Ascaris
Control 40/132 (30%) 46/132 (35%)
Intervention 35/154 (23%) 49/154 (32%) 1.22 (0.77–1.93), p=0.4 1.17 (0.73–1.86), p=0.51
Coinfection,≥2 STH
Control 22/132 (17%) 30/132 (23%) .. ..
Intervention 25/154 (16%) 35/154 (23%) 1.03 (0.55–1.93), p=0.94 0.97 (0.51–1.85), p=0.93

Analysis includes children with complete observations at baseline and 12-month visits. Prevalence results are presented as (n/N (%)). All effect estimates are presented as prevalence ratios (ratio of ratios) with 95% confidence intervals and estimated using generalized estimating equations to fit Poisson regression models with robust standard errors.

* Pathogen outcomes adjusted for child age and sex, caregiver’s education, and household wealth index, reported diarrhea also adjusted for baseline presence of a drop-hole cover and reported use of a tap on compound grounds as primary drinking water source.

† Models would not converge due to sparse data.