Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;10:e62278. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62278

Table 2. Effect of the intervention on bacterial, protozoan, viral, and STH infection and diarrhea at 12 and 24 months post-intervention.

Table 2—source code 1. Intervention effect at 12 and 24 months.
Table 2—source data 1. Intervention effect at 12 and 24 months.
Prevalence 12-month Prevalence ratio (95% CI), p-value * 24-month Prevalence ratio (95% CI), p-value
Baseline 12 month 24 month Unadjusted Adjusted§ Unadjusted Adjusted§
Any bacterial or protozoan infection‡
Control 313/392 (80%) 334/395 (85%) 403/459 (88%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 278/361 (77%) 347/408 (85%) 392/462 (85%) 1.04 (0.94–1.15), p=0.41 1.04 (0.94–1.15), p=0.41 1.00 (0.91–1.10), p=1.0 0.99 (0.91–1.09), p=0.89
Any STH infection‡
Control 170/360 (47%) 143/283 (51%) 142/253 (56%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 138/329 (42%) 150/305 (49%) 136/292 (47%) 1.12 (0.89–1.40), p=0.33 1.11 (0.89–1.38), p=0.35 0.94 (0.75–1.17), p=0.59 0.95 (0.77–1.17), p=0.62
Diarrhea‡
Control 67/526 (13%) 40/430 (9.3%) 53/390 (14%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 59/448 (13%) 59/436 (14%) 53/410 (13%) 1.41 (0.80–2.48), p=0.24 1.69 (0.89–3.21), p=0.11 0.92 (0.55–1.54), p=0.76 0.84 (0.47–1.51), p=0.56
Any bacteria
Control 271/392 (69%) 285/395 (72%) 345/459 (75%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 227/361 (63%) 292/408 (72%) 324/462 (70%) 1.09 (0.95–1.25), p=0.25 1.09 (0.95–1.26), p=0.20 1.03 (0.90–1.18), p=0.69 1.00 (0.87–1.15), p=0.96
Shigella
Control 179/392 (46%) 204/395 (52%) 269/459 (59%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 152/361 (42%) 218/408 (53%) 245/462 (53%) 1.13 (0.91–1.39), p=0.28 1.12 (0.92–1.38), p=0.27 0.98 (0.80–1.20), p=0.86 0.95 (0.79–1.16), p=0.64
ETEC
Control 116/392 (30%) 142/395 (36%) 127/459 (28%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 110/361 (30%) 143/408 (35%) 126/462 (27%) 0.93 (0.68–1.28), p=0.66 0.96 (0.69–1.33), p=0.81 0.95 (0.67–1.35), p=0.77 0.83 (0.57–1.19), p=0.31
Campylobacter
Control 39/392 (9.9%) 32/395 (8.1%) 48/459 (10%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 21/361 (5.8%) 35/408 (8.6%) 34/462 (7.4%) 1.78 (0.89–3.56), p=0.10 1.68 (0.82–3.45), p=0.16 1.20 (0.60–2.39), p=0.60 1.28 (0.62–2.62), 0.50
C. difficile
Control 22/392 (5.6%) 13/395 (3.3%) 13/459 (2.8%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 13/361 (3.6%) 17/408 (4.2%) 11/462 (2.4%) 1.95 (0.71–5.35), p=0.20 2.09 (0.77–5.64), p=0.15 1.32 (0.47–3.73), p=0.60 1.41 (0.46–4.30), p=0.54
E. coli O157
Control 13/392 (3.3%) 19/395 (4.8%) 25/459 (5.5%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 18/361 (5.0%) 14/408 (3.4%) 16/462 (3.5%) 0.48 (0.18–1.27), p=0.14 0.46 (0.18–1.21), p=0.12 0.43 (0.15–1.29), p=0.13 0.52 (0.17–1.59), p=0.25
STEC
Control 3/392 (0.77%) 9/395 (2.3%) 17/459 (3.7%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 10/361 (2.8%) 5/408 (1.2%) 15/462 (3.3%) 0.14 (0.03–0.67), p=0.014 0.15 (0.03–0.70), p=0.016 0.23 (0.05–1.03), p=0.055 0.24 (0.05–1.01), p=0.052
Any protozoa
Control 205/392 (52%) 236/395 (60%) 303/459 (66%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 195/361 (54%) 259/408 (63%) 296/462 (64%) 1.04 (0.87–1.24), p=0.69 1.03 (0.86–1.22), p=0.76 0.93 (0.78–1.11), p=0.40 0.91 (0.76–1.09), p=0.29
Giardia
Control 201/392 (51%) 230/395 (58%) 294/459 (64%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 186/361 (52%) 251/408 (62%) 289/462 (63%) 1.06 (0.88–1.27), p=0.55 1.05 (0.88–1.25), p=0.58 0.96 (0.80–1.14), p=0.61 0.93 (0.78–1.11), p=0.44
Cryptosporidium
Control 8/392 (2%) 8/395 (2%) 14/459 (3.0%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 16/361 (4.4%) 15/408 (3.7%) 15/462 (3.3%) 0.89 (0.23–3.43), p=0.87 0.89 (0.24–3.31), p=0.86 0.46 (0.11–1.93), p=0.29 0.53 (0.13–2.14), p=0.37
Any virus
Control 53/392 (14%) 52/395 (13%) 59/459 (13%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 52/361 (14%) 45/408 (11%) 62/462 (13%) 0.77 (0.45–1.32), p=0.35 0.75 (0.44–1.27), p=0.29 0.96 (0.55–1.68), p=0.88 1.03 (0.57–1.86), p=0.92
Norovirus GI/GII
Control 38/392 (9.7%) 44/395 (11%) 47/459 (10%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 39/361 (11%) 37/408 (9.1%) 55/462 (12%) 0.71 (0.38–1.33), p=0.28 0.68 (0.36–1.27), p=0.23 1.00 (0.52–1.93), p=0.99 1.10 (0.55–2.18), p=0.79
Adenovirus 40/41
Control 13/392 (3.3%) 9/395 (2.3%) 7/459 (1.5%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 9/361 (2.5%) 9/408 (2.2%) 6/462 (1.3%) 1.34 (0.34–5.23), p=0.68 1.24 (0.32–4.83), p=0.76 1.18 (0.23–5.98), p=0.84 0.97 (0.18–5.19), p=0.97
Coinfection, ≥2 GPP pathogens
Control 206/392 (53%) 237/395 (60%) 302/459 (66%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 185/361 (51%) 257/408 (63%) 282/462 (61%) 1.08 (0.90–1.29), p=0.39 1.08 (0.91–1.29), p=0.37 0.95 (0.80–1.12), p=0.54 0.93 (0.79–1.10), p=0.41
Trichuris
Control 139/360 (39%) 116/283 (41%) 124/253 (49%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 117/329 (36%) 120/305 (39%) 117/292 (40%) 1.05 (0.82–1.35), p=0.68 1.01 (0.79–1.28), p=0.96 0.89 (0.69–1.16), p=0.40 0.86 (0.67–1.10), p=0.22
Ascaris
Control 95/360 (26%) 82/283 (29%) 78/253 (31%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 68/329 (21%) 87/305 (29%) 56/292 (19%) 1.26 (0.87–1.82), p=0.22 1.33 (0.92–1.93), p=0.13 0.80 (0.52–1.21), p=29 0.83 (0.54–1.27), p=0.39
Coinfection, ≥2 STH
Control 64/360 (18%) 55/283 (19%) 60/253 (24%) .. .. .. ..
Intervention 47/329 (14%) 57/305 (19%) 37/292 (13%) 1.16 (0.76–1.77), p=0.50 1.17 (0.76–1.79), p=0.49 0.67 (0.40–1.13), p=0.13 0.63 (0.37–1.07), p=0.084

Prevalence results are presented as (n/N (%)). All effect estimates are presented as prevalence ratios (ratio of ratios) and estimated using generalized estimating equations to fit Poisson regression models with robust standard errors.

*Analysis includes all children measured at baseline and 12-month visits.

Analysis includes all children measured at baseline and 24 month visits.

‡Outcome was pre-specified in trial registration. All other outcomes are exploratory.

§Pathogen outcomes adjusted for child age and sex, caregiver’s education, and household wealth index. Reported diarrhea was also adjusted for baseline presence of a drop-hole cover and reported use of a tap on compound grounds as primary drinking water source. Sample sizes for adjusted analyses are slightly smaller than numbers presented in prevalence estimates due to missing covariate data. Y. enterocolitica, V. cholerae, E. histolytica, and rotavirus were detected in <2% of samples in each arm at each phase. Descriptive data for these pathogens are available in the Appendix 1—table 2. Source files available in Table 2—source data 1 and Table 2—source code 1.