Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;10:e62278. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62278

Table 3. Effect of intervention on bacterial, protozoan, viral, and STH infection and reported diarrhea in children born into study sites post-intervention (post-baseline) but by 24-month visit compared with children of a similar age at baseline (<2 years old).

Table 3—source code 1. Intervention effect on children born after implementation.
Table 3—source data 1. Intervention effect on children born after implementation.
Prevalence (<2 years old) Prevalence ratio (95% CI), p-value
Baseline 24 month, Born-in Unadjusted Adjusted
Any bacterial or protozoan infection*
Control 158/228 (69%) 79/106 (75%) .. ..
Intervention 129/201 (64%) 71/107 (66%) 0.96 (0.77–1.21), p=0.74 0.99 (0.80–1.22), p=0.92
Any STH infection*
Control 67/205 (33%) 25/68 (37%) .. ..
Intervention 52/183 (28%) 13/75 (17%) 0.52 (0.26–1.05), p=0.069 0.51 (0.27–0.95), p=0.035
Diarrhea*
Control 46/283 (16%) 18/105 (17%) .. ..
Intervention 43/238 (18%) 22/100 (22%) 1.20 (0.57–2.5), p=0.64 1.37 (0.47–4.03), p=0.57
Any bacteria
Control 142/228 (62%) 70/106 (66%) .. ..
Intervention 102/201 (51%) 51/107 (48%) 0.89 (0.66–1.20), p=0.44 0.90 (0.67–1.19), p=0.45
Shigella
Control 67/228 (29%) 36/106 (34%) .. ..
Intervention 49/201 (24%) 15/107 (14%) 0.48 (0.28–0.83), p=0.009 0.49 (0.28–0.85), p=0.011
ETEC
Control 70/228 (31%) 30/106 (28%) .. ..
Intervention 58/201 (29%) 24/107 (22%) 0.84 (0.46–1.52), p=0.56 0.85 (0.48–1.51), p=0.58
Campylobacter
Control 27/228 (12%) 14/106 (13%) .. ..
Intervention 14/201 (7%) 13/107 (12%) 1.75 (0.63–4.87), p=0.29 1.75 (0.61–4.98), p=0.30
C. difficile
Control 20/228 (8.8%) 7/106 (6.6%) .. ..
Intervention 13/201 (6.5%) 7/107 (6.5%) 1.33 (0.36–4.86), p=0.67 1.49 (0.41–5.44), p=0.55
E. coli O157
Control 7/228 (3.1%) 3/106 (2.8%) .. ..
Intervention 9/201 (4.5%) 2/107 (1.9%) 0.45 (0.06–3.66), p=0.46 0.53 (0.07–4.24), p=0.55
STEC
Control 1/228 (0.44%) 2/106 (1.9%) .. ..
Intervention 9/201 (4.5%) 1/107 (0.93%) 0.05 (0.00–1.13), p=0.059 0.05 (0.00–1.26), p=0.070
Any protozoa
Control 82/228 (36%) 47/106 (44%) .. ..
Intervention 74/201 (37%) 43/107 (40%) 0.84 (0.55–1.28), p=0.42 0.90 (0.62–1.30), p=0.58
Giardia
Control 79/228 (35%) 44/106 (42%) .. ..
Intervention 68/201 (34%) 41/107 (38%) 0.90 (0.58–1.39), p=0.63 0.93 (0.64–1.36), p=0.70
Cryptosporidium
Control 7/228 (3.1%) 5/106 (4.7%) .. ..
Intervention 12/201 (6%) 5/107 (4.7%) 0.45 (0.08–2.57), p=0.37 0.64 (0.12–3.51), p=0.61
Any virus
Control 34/228 (15%) 18/106 (17%) .. ..
Intervention 36/201 (18%) 18/107 (17%) 0.83 (0.37–1.83), p=0.64 0.83 (0.37–1.87), p=0.66
Norovirus GI/GII
Control 26/228 (11%) 12/106 (11%) .. ..
Intervention 26/201 (13%) 17/107 (16%) 1.24 (0.48–3.17), p=0.66 1.29 (0.49–3.41), p=0.61
Adenovirus 40/41
Control 7/228 (3.1%) 4/106 (3.8%) .. ..
Intervention 7/201 (3.5%) 0/107 (0.0%) ..§ ..§
Coinfection, ≥2 GPP pathogens
Control 92/228 (40%) 52/106 (49%) .. ..
Intervention 74/201 (37%) 39/107 (36%) 0.82 (0.56–1.21), p=0.33 0.86 (0.59–1.24), p=0.41
Trichuris
Control 48/205 (23%) 18/68 (26%) .. ..
Intervention 41/183 (22%) 5/75 (6.7%) 0.25 (0.09–0.68), p=0.006 0.24 (0.10–0.60), p=0.002
Ascaris
Control 45/205 (22%) 16/68 (24%) .. ..
Intervention 29/183 (16%) 9/75 (12%) 0.70 (0.30–1.64), p=0.42 0.68 (0.30–1.54), p=0.36
Coinfection, ≥2 STH
Control 26/205 (13%) 9/68 (13%) .. ..
Intervention 18/183 (9.8%) 1/75 (1.3%) 0.13 (0.02–1.08), p=0.059 0.12 (0.01–1.02), p=0.052

Analysis includes children < 2 years old at baseline and children born into the study after baseline and <2 years old at the time of the 24-month visit. Prevalence results are presented as (n/N (%)). All effect estimates are presented as prevalence ratios (ratio of ratios) and estimated using generalized estimating equations to fit Poisson regression models with robust standard errors.

*Outcome was pre-specified in trial registration. All other outcomes are exploratory.

Pathogen outcomes adjusted for child age and sex, caregiver’s education, and household wealth index. Reported diarrhea was also adjusted for baseline presence of a drop-hole cover and reported use of a tap on compound grounds as primary drinking water source. Sample sizes for adjusted analyses are slightly smaller than numbers presented in prevalence estimates due to missing covariate data.

§Models would not converge due to sparse data. Y. enterocolitica, V. cholerae, E. histolytica, and rotavirus were detected in <2% of samples in each arm at each phase and excluded. Descriptive data for these pathogens are available in the Appendix 1—table 2. Source files available in Table 3—source data 1 and Table 3—source code 1.