Table 4. Differences in gene expression of selected markers in ECV-304 and RT-4 cells compared to the results of urine pools C and HR of RNA-Seq.
| Transcript | HR [TPM] | C [TPM] | lg(HR/C) | ECV-304 | RT-4 | lg(ECV-304/ RT-4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXCL8 | 382.32 | 93.83 | 0.61 | 111.86 | 181.13 | -0.21 |
| RPS27 | 395.04 | 133.20 | 0.47 | 149.51 | 81.14 | 0.27 |
| RPL23A | 82.19 | 24.97 | 0.52 | 327.93 | 383.14 | -0.07 |
| TRAM1 | 4.28 | 12.23 | -0.46 | 35.83 | 143.36 | -0.60 |
| S100A6 | 90.06 | 21.49 | 0.62 | 1027.96 | 281.88 | 0.56 |
Shown are the TPM and lg(fc) values of the high risk (HR) and the control (C) patient pool for five potential biomarkers, which were previously analyzed via RNA-Seq. These selected marker candidates were also analyzed in bladder cancer cell lines (ECV-304 and RT-4) via RT-qPCR (see Tables 2 and 3). All data was normalized to the expression of 18S rRNA and used for calculation of lg(fc) values.