Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;7(5):e06938. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06938

Table 3.

Comparisons of the types on personality functioning and symptom severity.

Mean scale scores Undercontrolled
M(SD)
Overcontrolled
M(SD)
Resilient
M(SD)
F value Post-hoc comparisons
LPFS-BF 2.0
Total
Self
Interpersonal
(n = 15)
3.50 (.30)
3.77 (.18)
3.23 (.54)
(n = 84)
3.03 (.38)
3.48 (.45)
2.58 (.53)
(n = 79)
2.51 (.52)
2.84 (.63)
2.17 (.61)

47.16
39.18
26.06

UO*, UR**, OR**
UR**, OR**
UO**, UR**, OR**
SIPP-SF
Self-Control
(n = 15)
1.77 (.56)
(n = 84)
2.35 (.56)
(n = 79)
2.85 (.63)

27.82

UO*, UR**, OR**
Identity Integration 1.74 (.46) 1.82 (.55) 2.33 (.68) 16.45 UR*, OR**
Responsibility 2.17 (.64) 2.80 (.55) 3.15 (.55) 22.24 UO**, UR**, OR**
Relational Capacities 1.78 (.48) 2.12 (.57) 2.46 (.61) 12.14 UR**, OR*
Social Concordance 2.16 (.64) 2.85 (.53) 2.93 (.59) 24.70 UO**, UR**, OR*
BSI
Total
(n = 15)
2.31 (.58)
(n = 87)
2.02 (.65)
(n = 81)
1.43 (.60)

24.88

UR**, OR**

Tukey post-hoc comparisons, **p < .001, *p < .01; UO = significant difference between undercontrolled and overcontrolled types, UR = significant difference between undercontrolled and resilient types, OR = significant difference between overcontrolled and resilient types; higher LPFS-BF 2.0 scores indicate more impairment; higher SIPP-SF scores indicate more adaptive functioning.