Abstract
Ocular morphogenesis in vertebrates is a highly organized process, orchestrated largely by intrinsic genetic programs that exhibit stringent spatiotemporal control. Alternations in these genetic instructions can lead to hereditary or nonhereditary congenital disorders, a major cause of childhood visual impairment, and contribute to common late-onset blinding diseases. Currently, limited treatment options exist for clinical phenotypes involving eye development. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of early-onset ocular disorders and highlights genetic complexities in development and diseases, specifically focusing on coloboma, congenital glaucoma and Leber congenital amaurosis. We also discuss innovative paradigms for potential therapeutic modalities.
Keywords: Eye organogenesis, Congenital disorders, Ocular diseases, Vision impairment, Retinal development, Therapy
1. Introduction
Amongst the plethora of ocular disorders, congenital anomalies and early-onset diseases have particular significance. From a clinical perspective, these pediatric conditions frequently destine children to a lifetime of severe vision impairment and/or blindness, with long-lasting societal effects not least in terms of future employment. Equally, scientific importance of these largely heritable phenotypes is reflected by molecular entry points for characterizing developmental mechanisms relevant to the eye and frequently multiple other organ systems, as well as their substantial contribution to adult-onset diseases. Significance is further enhanced by the eye being an optically clear and uniquely accessible part of the central nervous system. These attributes facilitate phenotyping at the cellular level in vivo and have accelerated advancement of therapeutic approaches in multiple areas of medicine.
Appreciation of the mechanistic basis of pediatric disorders, presented here, is augmented by an understanding of key steps in eye development. In vertebrates, the eye's multiple components include the light-focusing cornea and lens of the anterior segment, and the posterior light-sensitive neural retina which captures, integrates and processes visual information before the optic nerve delivers it to the brain (Fig. 1A and 1B). First steps in human eye specification begin during the third and fourth week of gestation. These stages are stringently regulated, frequently in a reiterative manner, by molecular networks that include eye-field transcription factors as well as Hedgehog, Retinoic acid (RA), Wingless and int-1 (Wnt), Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and other signaling pathways [1,2]. After initial specification of the eye field and its subsequent Hedgehog-mediated separation into two domains, the earliest morphological evidence of ocular development is the evagination of the optic vesicles from the prosencephalon (Fig. 1C) [1,3]. Patterning along a proximal-distal axis yields the optic stalk that connects the optic vesicle to the forebrain and eventually forms the optic nerve. The distal portion of the optic vesicle later invaginates to form a bilayered optic cup, and the neural retina and retinal pigment epithelium ultimately differentiate from these laminae.
Fig. 1.
Cross-sectional images of the human eye (A) and the light-sensitive retina (B). (C) Development of the human eye. Eye field specification starts at around three weeks gestation in the anterior neural plate, followed by the formation of optic vesicle, lens, cornea and retina at various stages. ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer.
Among other essential phases of eye development is the contact of the optic vesicle with the overlying surface ectoderm, triggering a sequence of inductive events: first generating the lens placode, then the lens vesicle, and ultimately the crystalline lens that focuses incident light onto the retina. Extensive remodeling is also required for the optic cup to form an intact spherical globe, a process that involves closure of a large fissure on the ventral or inferior portion of the eye. Failure of this choroid fissure to close results in coloboma (plural colobomata) – a spectrum of pediatric defects and malformations that represent important causes of visual impairment and blindness. The tightly regulated interval during which the fissure is open provides transient intraocular access for migrating neural crest cells [4]. These stem cells delaminate from edges of the cranial neural tube, and after a lengthy migratory route, envelop the eye and contribute to numerous extra- and intra-ocular structures. Consequently, perturbation of neural crest function results in optic fissure closure defects [5,6] as well as diverse congenital ocular diseases, including Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome and congenital glaucoma.
Another key facet of ocular development concerns the processes by which retinal progenitor cells (RPCs), derived from neuroepithelium of the optic cup, form six distinct neuronal cell types and one type of glia in an ordered and overlapping sequence (Fig. 1B and 1C). A series of transcription factors and signaling molecules endow RPCs with competence to generate specific retinal cell types [7]. Intriguingly, many of these regulatory factors sub-serve the same function in other tissues, such as the cerebral cortex, highlighting conserved determination of cell fate across diverse Central Nervous System (CNS) tissues [8]. Transcriptome profiles of developing human retina have provided new insights into temporal and regional cell fate specification by suggesting distinct trajectories of neuronal birth in the fovea versus the peripheral retina [9]. Mutations in retinal developmental genes are key causes of profound pediatric vision loss [10], resulting both in Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and juvenile forms of retinitis pigmentosa [11]. Identification of disease-causing genes and elucidation of respective pathogenic mechanisms offer opportunities for developing novel treatment modalities.
2. Congenital eye diseases
Congenital eye defects account for up to 60% of blindness among infants and an estimated 1.4 million visually impaired children under the age of 16 worldwide [10,12]. Among over 450 reported clinical manifestations of congenital eye disorders in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (OMIM; https://omim.org), the etiology of many remains elusive. In this review, we briefly discuss the genetic basis of three common forms of pediatric eye disease – coloboma, congenital glaucoma and LCA and describe current treatment strategies, or those in progress, to alleviate the phenotypes and/or restore vision.
2.1. Ocular coloboma
Coloboma is a congenital anomaly which is estimated to account for 11% of pediatric blindness and characterized by an inferior or ventrally located gap in one or more tissues, extending between the cornea and the optic nerve [5,6]. Cases may be unilateral or bilateral, usually with a genetic etiology, and comprise a clinical spectrum that includes congenitally reduced ocular size (microphthalmia), and in severe cases, absence of one or both eyes (anophthalmia). Patients with unilateral anophthalmia and contralateral colobomatous microphthalmia demonstrate that these disorders represent a phenotypic continuum [13]. Although the mechanisms by which coloboma-causing mutations induce unilateral disease remain undefined, their identification is expected to signify a key step in determining therapeutic targets.
Coloboma is readily explicable by perturbed morphogenesis – failure of choroid fissure fusion. The severity broadly correlates with involvement of essential retinal structures, such as the macula. Consequently, iris colobomata that primarily intensify light entry are associated with a relatively mild vision impairment (20/30 to 20/60 acuity), while those affecting the retina, and particularly the macula and optic nerve, result in profound reductions in vision (potentially 20/200 to ‘counting fingers’ levels) (Fig. 2A). The last two decades have seen substantial advances in deciphering the genetic bases of coloboma, which is estimated to have a heritability of at least 80% in developed countries. Interestingly, extensive genetic heterogeneity exists, with mutations in almost 40 genes molecularly explaining only a minority of cases (Table 1A). Consequently, elucidation of molecules and pathways involved in optic fissure closure continues to uncover disease-causing coloboma genes.
Fig. 2.
Etiology and phenotypes of pediatric eye diseases. (A) Coloboma. Optic fissure closure defects affecting the formation of the optic nerve (upper) and iris (lower) as shown by graphic illustration (left), clinical images (middle) and fundus images (right). The blue circles and arrows highlight the approximate location of the optic fissure closure defects in the eye. In the upper panel, there is colobomatous enlargement of the optic nerve without iris involvement. In contrast, both the iris and the retina are impacted in the lower panel. (B) Congenital glaucoma. Increased intraocular pressure causes corneal enlargement with splits in Descemet's membrane. Also present are a detached posterior embryotoxon (white arrow) and irido-corneal adhesions (middle and right). (C) Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is characterized by dysfunction or loss light-sensitive photoreceptors. In this patient, the death of photoreceptors is caused by a loss-of-function mutation of RPE65 leading to visual cycle defect in the retinal pigment epithelium. White arrows in the fundus images (middle and right) indicate the affected regions.
Table 1.
Genes implicated in pathogenesis of pediatric eye diseases
A Coloboma*
| OMIM number | Gene symbol | Protein | Phenotype | Mode of inheritance | Syndromic (S) or isolated (I) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102560 | ACTG1 | Actin gamma 1 | Deafness, autosomal dominant 20/26 | AD | S |
| 107480 | SALL1 | Spalt like transcription factor 1 | Townes-Brocks branchiootorenal-like syndrome; Townes-Brocks syndrome 1 | AD | S |
| 107580 | TFAP2A | Transcription factor AP-2 alpha | Branchiooculofacial syndrome | AD | S |
| 107773 | NR2F2 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group F member 2 | 46, XX sex reversal 5; Congenital heart defects, multiple types, 4 | AD | S |
| 109400 | PTCH2 | Patched 2 | Basal cell nevus syndrome | AD | S |
| 109400 | PTCH1 | Patched 1 | Basal cell nevus syndrome | AD | S |
| 109400 | SUFU | SUFU negative regulator of hedgehog signaling | Basal cell nevus syndrome | AD | S |
| 112262 | BMP4 | Bone morphogenetic protein 4 | Microphthalmia, syndromic 6; Orofacial cleft 11 | AD | S |
| 113620 | TFAP2A | Transcription factor AP-2 alpha | Branchiooculofacial syndrome | AD | S |
| 120330 | PAX2 | Paired box 2 | Papillorenal syndrome | AD | S |
| 120433 | YAP1 | Yes1 associated transcriptional regulator | Coloboma, ocular, with or without hearing impairment, cleft lip/palate, and/or mental retardation | AD | S |
| 132890 | NR2F1 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group F member 1 | Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf optic atrophy syndrome | AD | S |
| 142993 | VSX2 | Visual system homeobox 2 | Microphthalmia with coloboma 3; Microphthalmia, isolated 2 | AR | I |
| 145410 | GBBB2/ SPECC1L | Sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1 like | Opitz GBBB syndrome, type II | AD | S |
| 147950 | FGFR1 | Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 | Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia | AD | S |
| 154400 | SF3B4 | Splicing factor 3b subunit 4 | Acrofacial dysostosis 1, Nager type | AD | S |
| 154500 | TCOF1 | Treacle ribosome biogenesis factor 1 | Treacher Collins syndrome 1 | AD | S |
| 156845 | MITF | Melanocyte inducing transcription factor | COMMAD syndrome; Tietz albinism-deafness syndrome; Waardenburg syndrome, type 2A; Waardenburg syndrome/ocular albinism, digenic | AD or AR | S |
| 157170 | SIX3 | SIX homeobox 3 | Holoprosencephaly 2; Schizencephaly | AD | S or I |
| 163200 | NRAS | NRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase | Schimmelpenning-Feuerstein-Mims syndrome, somatic mosaic | AD | S |
| 163200 | HRAS | HRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase | Schimmelpenning-Feuerstein-Mims syndrome, somatic mosaic | AD | S |
| 163200 | KRAS | KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase | Schimmelpenning-Feuerstein-Mims syndrome, somatic mosaic | AD | S |
| 164950 | FGF3 | Fibroblast growth factor 3 | Deafness, congenital with inner ear agenesis, microtia, and microdontia | AR | S |
| 167409 | PAX2 | Paired box 2 | Glomerulosclerosis, focal segmental, 7 | AD | S |
| 177075 | MAF | MAF bZIP transcription factor | Cataract 21, multiple types; Ayme-Gripp syndrome | AD | S or I |
| 184429 | SOX2 | SRY-box transcription factor 2 | Optic nerve hypoplasia and abnormalities of the central nervous system; Microphthalmia, syndromic 3 | AD | S |
| 191170 | TP53 | Tumor protein p53 | Adrenocortical carcinoma, pediatric; Basal cell carcinoma 7; Choroid plexus papilloma; Colorectal cancer; Glioma susceptibility 1; Osteosarcoma; Bone marrow failure syndrome 5; Breast cancer, somatic; Hepatocellular carcinoma, somatic; Li-Fraumeni syndrome; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, somatic; Pancreatic cancer, somatic | AD, SMu | S |
| 200990 | KIF7 | Kinesin family member 7 | Joubert syndrome 12; Acrocallosal syndrome; Al-Gazali-Bakalinova syndrome; Hydrolethalus syndrome 2 | AR | S |
| 206700 | ITPR1 | Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1 | Gillespie syndrome | AD or AR | S |
| 206900 | SOX2 | SRY-box transcription factor 2 | Optic nerve hypoplasia and abnormalities of the central nervous system; Microphthalmia, syndromic 3 | AD | S |
| 213300 | INPP5E | Inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E | Joubert syndrome 1 | AR | S |
| 216360 | TMEM67 | Transmembrane protein 67 | COACH syndrome 1 | AR | S |
| 216820 | SALL2 | Spalt like transcription factor 2 | Coloboma, ocular | AR | I |
| 218340 | C12orf57 | Temtamy syndrome | AR | S | |
| 221900 | ATOH7 | Atonal bHLH transcription factor 7 | Persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous | AR | I |
| 235730 | ZEB2 | Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2 | Mowat-Wilson syndrome | AD | S |
| 243310 | ACTB | Actin beta | CHARGE syndrome; Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia | AD | S |
| 243605 | CENPF | Centromere protein F | Stromme syndrome | AR | S |
| 244450 | UBE3B | Ubiquitin protein ligase E3B | Single median maxillary central incisor | AD | S |
| 248190 | CLDN19 | Claudin 19 | Hypomagnesemia 5, renal, with ocular involvement | AR | S |
| 248390 | POLR1C | RNA polymerase I and III subunit C | Treacher Collins syndrome 3 | AR | S |
| 248450 | FREM1 | FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1 | Manitoba oculotrichoanal syndrome | AR | S |
| 263750 | DHODH | Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone) | Miller syndrome | AR | S |
| 270420 | SPINT2 | Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kunitz type 2 | Diarrhea 3, secretory sodium, congenital and chorioretinal coloboma | AR | S |
| 274270 | DPYD | Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase | Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency; 5-fluorouracil toxicity | AR | S |
| 300166 | BCOR | BCL6 corepressor | Microphthalmia, syndromic 2 | XLD | 1 |
| 300244 | FLNA | Filamin A | Terminal osseous dysplasia | XLD | S |
| 300307 | GZF1 | GDNF inducible zinc finger protein 1 | Cleft palate with ankyloglossia | AR | S |
| 300463 | PQBP1 | Polyglutamine binding protein 1 | Renpenning syndrome | XLR | S |
| 300472 | IGBP1 | Immunoglobulin binding protein 1 | Corpus callosum, agenesis of, with mental retardation, ocular coloboma and micrognathia | XLR | S |
| 300915 | HMGB3 | High mobility group box 3 | Microphthalmia, syndromic 13 | XL | S |
| 309500 | PQBP1 | Polyglutamine binding protein 1 | Renpenning syndrome | XLR | S |
| 309800 | NAA10 | N-alpha-acetyltransferase 10, NatA catalytic subunit | Microphthalmia, syndromic 1 | XL | I |
| 600037 | OTX2 | Orthodenticle homeobox 2 | Microphthalmia, syndromic 5; Retinal dystrophy, early-onset, with or without pituitary dysfunction; Pituitary hormone deficiency, combined, 6 | AD | I |
| 600251 | SPECC1L | Sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1 like | Facial clefting, oblique, 1 | AD | S |
| 600463 | ALDH1A3 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A3 | Microphthalmia, isolated 8 | AR | I |
| 600725 | SHH | Sonic hedgehog signaling molecule | Holoprosencephaly 3; Microphthalmia with coloboma 5; Schizencephaly; Single median maxillary central incisor | AD | S or I |
| 601147 | GDF6 | Growth differentiation factor 6 | Klippel-Feil syndrome 1; | AD or AR | S |
| 601147 | GDF6 | Growth differentiation factor 6 | Microphthalmia with coloboma 6, digenic; Leber congenital amaurosis 17; Microphthalmia, isolated 4; Multiple synostoses syndrome 4 | AD or AR | I |
| 601186 | STRA6 | Signaling receptor and transporter of retinol STRA6 | Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 8, or syndromic 9 | AR | S or I |
| 601707 | SMO | Smoothened, frizzled class receptor | Curry-Jones syndrome, somatic mosaic | Unclear | S |
| 601723 | FZD5 | Frizzled class receptor 5 | Microphthalmic coloboma | AD | I |
| 601723 | FZD5 | Frizzled class receptor 5 | Microphthalmic coloboma | AD | I |
| 602000 | POLR1B | RNA polymerase I subunit B | Treacher-Collins syndrome 4 | AD | S |
| 602457 | FADD | Fas associated via death domain | Infections, recurrent, with encephalopathy, hepatic dysfunction, and cardiovascular malformations | AR | S |
| 603714 | SIX3 | SIX homeobox 3 | Holoprosencephaly 2; Schizencephaly | AD | S or I |
| 604219 | CRYAA | Crystallin alpha A | Cataract 9, multiple types | AD or AR | I |
| 604294 | VAX1 | Ventral anterior homeobox 1 | Microphthalmia, syndromic 11 | AR | I |
| 605124 | SPINT2 | Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kunitz type 2 | Diarrhea 3, secretory sodium, congenital and chorioretinal coloboma | AR | S |
| 605452 | ABCB6 | ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 6 | Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 7; dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria 3; pseudohyperkalemia, familial, 2, due to red cell leak | AD | S or I |
| 605947 | PIGL | Phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class L | CHIME syndrome | AR | S |
| 606522 | GDF3 | Growth differentiation factor 3 | Microphthalmia with coloboma 6, or isolated 7; Klippel-Feil syndrome 3 | AD | S or I |
| 607086 | AAT1 | Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 1 | Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 1 | Unknown | S |
| 607108 | PAX6 | Paired box gene 6 | Coloboma of optic nerve; Coloboma, ocular; Morning glory disc anomaly; Aniridia; Anterior segment dysgenesis 5, multiple subtypes; Cataract with late-onset corneal dystrophy; Foveal hypoplasia 1; Keratitis; Optic nerve hypoplasia | AD | I |
| 607906 | ALG2 | ALG2 alpha-1,3/1,6-mannosyltransferase | Congenital disorder of glycosylation, type Ii | AR | S |
| 608166 | SEMA3E | Semaphorin 3E | CHARGE syndrome | AD | S |
| 608296 | FIBP | FGF1 intracellular binding protein | Thauvin-Robinet-Faivre syndrome | AR | S |
| 608488 | SMOC1 | SPARC related modular calcium binding 1 | Microphthalmia with limb anomalies | AR | S |
| 608553 | NMNAT1 | Nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1 | Leber congenital amaurosis 9 | AR | I |
| 608572 | TXNL4A | Thioredoxin like 4A | Burn-McKeown syndrome | AR | S |
| 608892 | CHD7 | Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7 | CHARGE syndrome; Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia | AD | S |
| 608944 | FREM1 | FRAS1 related extracellular matrix 1 | Bifid nose with or without anorectal and renal anomalies; Manitoba oculotrichoanal syndrome; Trigonocephaly 2 | AD or AR | S |
| 609637 | ZIC2 | Zic family member 2 | Holoprosencephaly 5 | AD | I |
| 610256 | FOXE3 | Forkhead box E3 | Anterior segment dysgenesis 2, multiple subtypes | AR | I |
| 610688 | TMEM67 | Transmembrane protein 67 | Joubert syndrome 6 | AR | S |
| 610745 | STRA6 | Signaling receptor and transporter of retinol STRA6 | Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 8, or syndromic 9 | AR | S or I |
| 610937 | RPGRIP1L | RPGRIP1 like | COACH syndrome 3; Joubert syndrome 7; Meckel syndrome 5 | Unknown | S |
| 611254 | KIF7 | Kinesin family member 7 | Joubert syndrome 12; Acrocallosal syndrome; Al-Gazali-Bakalinova syndrome; Hydrolethalus syndrome 2 | AR | S |
| 611499 | GUSB | Glucuronidase beta | Mucopolysaccharidosis VII | AR | S |
| 612109 | HMX1 | H6 family homeobox 1 | Oculoauricular syndrome | AR | S |
| 612379 | SRD5A3 | Steroid 5 alpha-reductase 3 | Congenital disorder of glycosylation, type Iq | AR | S |
| 612713 | SRD5A3 | Steroid 5 alpha-reductase 3 | Kahrizi syndrome | AR | S |
| 612779 | DPYD | Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase | Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency; 5-fluorouracil toxicity | AR | S |
| 613001 | FGFR1 | Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 | Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis, somatic mosaic | Unknown | S |
| 613456 | ALX1 | ALX homeobox 1 | Frontonasal dysplasia 3 | AR | S |
| 613477 | PDE6D | Phosphodiesterase 6D | Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 5 | AD | S |
| 613477 | PDE6D | Phosphodiesterase 6D | Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 5 | AD | S |
| 613517 | MCOP6/ PRSS56 | Serine protease 56 | Microphthalmia, isolated 6 | AR | I |
| 613674 | SOX17 | SRY-box transcription factor 17 | Vesicoureteral reflux 3 | AD | S |
| 613717 | POLR1D | RNA polymerase I and III subunit D | Treacher Collins syndrome 2 | AD or AR | S |
| 613842 | GZF1 | GDNF inducible zinc finger protein 1 | Joint laxity, short stature, and myopia | AR | S |
| 614583 | ACTG1 | Actin gamma 1 | Baraitser-Winter syndrome 2 | AD | S |
| 615009 | PACS1 | Phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 1 | Schuurs-Hoeijmakers syndrome | AD | S |
| 615113 | ALDH1A3 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A3 | Microphthalmia, isolated 8 | AR | I |
| 615140 | C12orf57 | Temtamy syndrome | AR | S | |
| 615145 | TENM3 | Teneurin transmembrane protein 3 | Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 9, or syndromic 15 | AR | S or I |
| 615147 | RBP4 | Retinol binding protein 4 | Retinal dystrophy, iris coloboma, and comedogenic acne syndrome | AR | S or I |
| 615665 | PDE6D | Phosphodiesterase 6D | Joubert syndrome 22 | AR | S |
| 615665 | PDE6D | Phosphodiesterase 6D | Joubert syndrome 22 | AR | S |
| 615877 | MAB21L2 | Mab-21 like 2 | Microphthalmia/coloboma and skeletal dysplasia syndrome | AD, AR | S |
| 615877 | MAB21L2 | Mab-21 like 2 | Microphthalmia/coloboma and skeletal dysplasia syndrome | AD or AR | S or I |
| 616428 | RBP4 | Retinol binding protein 4 | Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 10 | AD | I |
| 616490 | KIAA0586 | KIAA0586 | Joubert syndrome 23 | AR | S |
| 616722 | MIR204 | microRNA 204 | Retinal dystrophy and iris coloboma with or without cataract | AD | I |
| 616789 | MED13L | Mediator complex subunit 13L | Mental retardation and distinctive facial features with or without cardiac defects | AD | S |
| 617107 | FIBP | FGF1 intracellular binding protein | Thauvin-Robinet-Faivre syndrome | AR | S |
| 617662 | GZF1 | GDNF inducible zinc finger protein 1 | Joint laxity, short stature, and myopia | AR | S |
| 618586 | WDR37 | WD repeat domain 37 | Neurooculocardiogenitourinary syndrome | AD | S |
| 618652 | WDR37 | WD repeat domain 37 | Neurooculocardiogenitourinary syndrome | AD | S |
| 618939 | POLR1B | RNA polymerase I subunit B | Treacher-Collins syndrome 4 | AD | S |
| 619113 | RPGRIP1L | RPGRIP1 like | COACH syndrome 3; Joubert syndrome 7; Meckel syndrome 5 | Unknown | S |
*There are 317 entries in OMIM for coloboma. This table only lists those with strong association to coloboma or diseases with coloboma as one of the major clinical characteristics. AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; DR, digenic recessive; SMu, Somatic mutation; XL, X-linked; XLD, X-linked dominant; XLR, X-linked recessive.
Ocular morphogenesis is guided by combinatorial interactions of transcription factors and gradients of signaling molecules; therefore, such components are frequently associated with coloboma (and of micro/anophthalmia) (Table 1A). For instance, Pax2 and Pax6 have essential antagonistic roles in the dorsal-ventral partitioning of the developing optic vesicle, respectively delineating the optic stalk and optic cup. Mutations of PAX2 induce optic nerve colobomata (and renal anomalies), while PAX6 mutations can lead to an extensive anomaly spectrum that includes coloboma and microphthalmia [14]. Similarly, perturbation of every phase of eye development, from eye field specification through migration of retinal progenitor cells and axis formation to the migration of the neural crest-derived periocular mesenchyme, may impair choroid fissure closure. Indeed, reflecting the fundamental nature of these processes, causative mutations have now been identified in members of most developmental pathways such as those corresponding to Hedgehog, RA, Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), TGF-β, Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), Wnt and Hippo signaling [6,15]. The main exception appears to be Notch signaling, where ligand mutation induces coloboma in murine but leads to discrete anterior segment phenotypes in patients [16]. Genes involved in cell proliferation/migration/death signaling pathways are also involved in epithelial remodeling at the fissure, yet apoptosis has not been detected by a recent transcriptome analysis of optic fissure closure signature genes using human samples, thereby suggesting distinctions among species [15,17]. It is also important to highlight that the process of tissue fusion required for choroid fissure closure is not unique to the eye and occurs at multiple sites including the neural tube, palate and lip. Likely reflecting evolutionary parsimony, genetic pathways implicated in coloboma, neural tube defects and cleft palate are largely conserved and therefore treatment strategies developed in one tissue may have applicability to others.
2.2. Anterior segment dysgenesis
The anterior segment of the eye comprises the tissues (from cornea to lens) that lie in front of the vitreous. Their key roles include refracting and focusing incident light onto the retina and circulating aqueous humor, which is essential for maintaining clarity of the avascular cornea and lens. Maldevelopment of the anterior segment frequently results in early-onset glaucoma. One of the subtypes, congenital glaucoma, is characterized by chronic intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. Affected infants exhibit ocular enlargement which manifests as increased corneal diameter and frequently splits in Descemet's membrane (Haab striae) [18] as well as increased lacrimation (Fig. 2B). Additional features include angle anomalies, IOP elevation to 30–50 mm of mercury, and optic disc cupping that may be partially reversible with prompt normalization of IOP [19]. Iris alterations are observed in some molecular subtypes, along with a range of systemic anomalies in syndromic cases. Clinical management of the patients is usually surgical and is reviewed in [20].
Although exhibiting some common etiologies with coloboma, congenital glaucoma can be caused by alteration of transcription factors or signaling pathways crucial for the development of the anterior segment. From a genetics standpoint, the congenital glaucoma phenotype is intriguing for its molecular diversity, which encompasses alterations in RA, TGF-β and angiopoietin signaling as well as transcriptional networks involving PAX6, FOXC1 and PITX2 [21], [22], [23], [24], [25] (Table 1B). These developmental pathways control the formation of anterior segment of the eye, and their perturbation impairs aqueous humor drainage and induces IOP elevation. A majority of cases can be attributed to mutations in CYP1B1 [26,27], which encodes a cytochrome P450 oxygenase for stepwise conversion of retinol (vitamin A) to retinal and then to RA [28]. Biallelic CYP1B1 mutations result in near complete loss of function of this RA-synthesizing enzyme and thus disrupt RA morphogen gradients needed for the genesis of anterior segment, perturbing the peri-ocular mesenchyme from which the ciliary body, trabecular meshwork, iris, corneal stroma and endothelium are derived. RA also directly regulates FOXC1 and PITX2 [29], two transcription factors with fundamental roles in anterior segment development [21,23,24], likely explaining why ocular anomalies induced by FOXC1 and PITX2 mutations can phenocopy congenital glaucoma.
As a recessively inherited disorder, the incidence of congenital glaucoma is strongly influenced by geographic prevalence of consanguinity. Consanguineous cases are frequently bilateral, and more often associated with greater disease severity. In these patients, higher IOPs and the associated decrease in corneal clarity may preclude angle surgery (called goniotomy), necessitating more complex surgical approaches. Non-consanguineous cases are more often unilateral and amenable to goniotomy, suggesting that modifier loci may contribute to phenotypic severity. Notably, intermediate levels of RA resulting from a heterozygous CYP1B1 mutation induce milder disease, with such mutations explaining 5% of the related juvenile open-angle glaucoma phenotypes diagnosed between 5 and 40 years of age [30]. Thus, studies of early-onset and comparatively extreme pediatric phenotypes exemplify the power to decipher genetic mechanisms in common later-onset diseases.
A similar paradigm is illustrated by angiopoietin-Tie (ANG-TIE) signaling pathway, an essential regulator of blood and lymphatic development, in the genesis of congenital glaucoma. Mouse mutants with conditional deletion of the Angiopoietin 1 and 2 (Angpt1/2) ligands that bind to the TIE receptors develop ocular enlargement and optic neuropathy, in addition to complete absence of Schlemm's canal, a modified lymphatic that drains aqueous humor from the eye [31]. Heterozygous TIE2 mutations cause ~5% of congenital glaucoma [32], with a few disrupting TIE2 receptor clustering that is required for pathway activation [33]. TIE2 haploinsufficiency can recapitulate variable expressivity of CYP1B1-mediated congenital glaucoma in terms of age of onset and unilateral disease prevalence [32]. Subsequent investigations have identified ANGPT1 mutations in congenital glaucoma and, equally importantly, suggest the requirement of ANG-TIE signaling for maintaining the Schlemm's canal [34,35]. Intriguingly, aging-associated decline in functional integrity of Schlemm's canal can be rescued by an agonistic Tie2 antibody, at least in mice [34]. In light of Schlemm's canal's central role, additional ANG-TIE components are predicted to be involved in glaucoma pathogenesis, offering novel targets for intervention.
2.3. Leber congenital amaurosis
In vertebrates, photons are captured by light-sensitive photoreceptors in the neural retina, integrated and processed by interneurons (the horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells) and transmitted to the brain through the optic nerve composed of the retinal ganglion cell axons and glia (Fig. 1B). Vision loss stems from obstruction of the light path to the neural retina and inability of the retina to detect and/or transmit light-triggered signals to the brain. In retinal degenerative diseases, the irreversible blindness is largely attributable to dysfunction or death of photoreceptor cells [11] (Fig. 2C). Amongst such disorders, LCA is a group of severe and early-onset retinal diseases responsible for childhood blindness [36]. LCA patients exhibit profound visual impairment at infancy or in childhood, with almost undetectable full field electroretinogram, nystagmus (eye movements), poor pupillary light responses, and oculodigital reflex [37],[38]. LCA accounts for approximately 5% of all retinal dystrophies, affecting 2–3 per 100,000 live births with an estimated prevalence of 180,000 individuals worldwide [37].
Table 1b.
Congenital glaucoma#
| OMIM number | Gene symbol | Protein | Phenotype | Mode of inheritance | Syndromic (S) or isolated (I) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105650 | RPS19 | Ribosomal protein S19 | Diamond-Blackfan anemia 1 | AD | S |
| 137600 | PITX2 | Paired like homeodomain 2 | Anterior segment dysgenesis 4 | AD | I |
| 175780 | COL4A1 | Collagen type IV alpha 1 chain | Brain small vessel disease with or without ocular anomalies including congenital glaucoma | AD | S |
| 180849 | CREBBP | CREB binding protein | Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome 1 | AD | S |
| 236670 | POMT1 | Protein O-mannosyltransferase 1 | Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A, 1; Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with mental retardation), type B, 1; Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (limb-girdle), type C, 1 | AR | S |
| 249420 | SH3PXD2B | SH3 and PX domains 2B | Frank-ter Haar syndrome with or without glaucoma | AR | S |
| 251750 | LTBP2 | Latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2 | Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3; Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, D; Microspherophakia and/or megalocornea, with ectopia lentis and with or without secondary glaucoma | AR | S or I |
| 253280 | POMGNT1 | Protein O-linked mannose N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 1 (beta 1,2-) | Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A, 3 | AR | S |
| 600221 | TEK | TEK receptor tyrosine kinase | Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, E; Venous malformations, multiple cutaneous and mucosal | AD | S or I |
| 601090 | FOXC1 | Forkhead box C1 | Anterior segment dysgenesis 3, multiple subtypes; Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome, type 3 | AD | S or I |
| 601631 | FOXC1 | Forkhead box C1 | Anterior segment dysgenesis 3, multiple subtypes; Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome, type 3 | AD | S or I |
| 601652 | MYOC | Myocilin | Glaucoma 1A, primary open angle | AD | I |
| 601771 | CYP1B1 | Cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily B member 1 | Anterior segment dysgenesis 6, multiple subtypes; Glaucoma 3A, primary open angle, congenital, juvenile, or adult onset | AR | I |
| 602091 | LTBP2 | Latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2 | Weill-Marchesani syndrome 3; Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, D; Microspherophakia and/or megalocornea, with ectopia lentis and with or without secondary glaucoma | AR | S or I |
| 603474 | RPS19 | Ribosomal protein S19 | Diamond-Blackfan anemia 1 | AD | S |
| 604563 | SBF2 | SET binding factor 2 | Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 4B2 | AR | S |
| 607423 | POMT1 | Protein O-mannosyltransferase 1 | Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A, 1; Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with mental retardation), type B, 1; Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (limb-girdle), type C, 1 | AR | S |
| 610192 | GLIS3 | GLIS family zinc finger 3 | Diabetes mellitus, neonatal, with congenital hypothyroidism. Additional features include congenital glaucoma | AR | S |
| 610199 | GLIS3 | GLIS family zinc finger 3 | Diabetes mellitus, neonatal, with congenital hypothyroidism. Additional features include congenital glaucoma | AR | S |
| 613150 | POMT2 | Protein O-mannosyltransferase 2 | Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A, 2 | AR | S |
| 613293 | SH3PXD2B | SH3 and PX domains 2B | Frank-ter Haar syndrome with or without glaucoma | AR | S |
| 617315 | CYP1B1 | Cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily B member 1 | Anterior segment dysgenesis 6, multiple subtypes; Glaucoma 3A, primary open angle, congenital, juvenile, or adult onset | AR | I |
#There are 55 entries in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim) for congenital glaucoma. This table only lists those with strong association to congenital glaucoma or diseases with congenital glaucoma as one of the major clinical features. AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; XLR, X-linked recessive.
Table 1c.
Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA)^
| OMIM number | Gene symbol | Protein | Phenotype | Mode of inheritance | Syndromic (S) or isolated (I) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 204000 | GUCY2D | Guanylate cyclase 2D, retinal | Leber congenital amaurosis 1 | AD or AR | I |
| 601777 | Cone-rod dystrophy 6 | ||||
| 204100 | RPE65 | Retinoid isomerohydrolase RPE65 | Leber congenital amaurosis 2 | AR | I |
| 613794 | Retinitis pigmentosa 20 | ||||
| 618697 | Retinitis pigmentosa 87 with choroidal involvement | AD | |||
| 604232 | SPATA7 | Spermatogenesis associated 7 | Leber congenital amaurosis 3; Retinitis pigmentosa, juvenile |
AR | I |
| 604393 | AIPL1 | Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein like 1 | Cone-rod dystrophy; Retinitis pigmentosa, juvenile; Leber congenital amaurosis 4 | AD or AR | I |
| 604537 | LCA5 | Lebercilin LCA5 | Leber congenital amaurosis 5 | AR | I |
| 613826 | RPGRIP1 | RPGR interacting protein 1 | Leber congenital amaurosis 6 | AR | I |
| 613829 | CRX | Cone-rod homeobox | Leber congenital amaurosis 7 | AD | I |
| 613835 | CRB1 | Crumbs cell polarity complex component 1 | Leber congenital amaurosis 8 | AR | I |
| 600105 | Retinitis pigmentosa-12 | ||||
| 608553 | NMNAT1 | Nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 1 | Leber congenital amaurosis 9 | AR | I |
| 611755 | CEP290 | Centrosomal protein 290 | Leber congenital amaurosis 10 | AR | I or S |
| 610188 | Joubert syndrome 5 | ||||
| 610189 | Senior-Loken syndrome 6 | ||||
| 613837 | IMPDH1 | Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 | Leber congenital amaurosis 11 | AR | I |
| 180105 | Retinitis pigmentosa 10 | AD | |||
| 610612 | RD3 | RD3 regulator of GUCY2D | Leber congenital amaurosis 12 | AR | I |
| 612712 | RDH12 | Retinol dehydrogenase 12 | Leber congenital amaurosis 13 | AD or AR | I |
| 613341 | LRAT | Lecithin retinol acyltransferase | Retinitis pigmentosa, juvenile; Leber congenital amaurosis 14; Retinal dystrophy, early-onset severe | AR | I |
| 613843 | TULP1 | TUB like protein 1 | Leber congenital amaurosis 15 | AR | I |
| 600132 | |||||
| 614186 | KCNJ13 | Potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 13 | Leber congenital amaurosis 16 | AR | I |
| 615360 | GDF6 | Growth differentiation factor 6 | Leber congenital amaurosis 17 | AR | I |
| 608133 | PRPH2 | Peripherin 2 | Leber congenital amaurosis 18; Retinitis pigmentosa 7 and digenic form | AD or AR | I or S |
| 169150 | Macular dystrophy, patterned, 1 | ||||
| 618513 | USP45 | Ubiquitin specific peptidase 45 | Leber congenital amaurosis 19 | AR | I |
| 617879 | TUBB4B | Tubulin beta 4B class IVb | Leber congenital amaurosis with early-onset deafness | AD | S |
| 609237 | IQCB1 | IQ motif-containing protein B1 | Leber congenital amaurosis | AR | I or S |
| 609254 | Senior-Loken syndrome 5 | AR |
^There are 101 entries in OMIM (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim) for LCA. This table only lists the genes with strong association to LCA or diseases with LCA as one of the major clinical attributes. AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; DR, digenic recessive; XL, X-linked.
Molecular diagnosis of LCA can be challenging because of phenotypic variability and genetic heterogeneity. Mutations in at least 28 genes have been reported to cause 70-75% of LCA, which is largely inherited as an autosomal recessive trait though dominant mutations have been reported in IMPDH1, OTX2 and CRX genes [39] (Table 1C). LCA genes can be categorized in discrete functional classes, including transcriptional regulation and primary cilia (the photoreceptor outer segment is a modified cilium) biogenesis and transport. Pleiotropic effects of mutations in LCA genes add another level of genetic complexity; e.g., defects in cilia-associated genes (such as CEP290) can lead to syndromic diseases that usually include photoreceptor degeneration [40]. Genetic modifiers can also influence clinical features of ciliopathy gene defects; the phenotype of CEP290 mutations is amenable modifications by its interaction partners [41,42]. Although the rd16 mouse model phenocopies CEP290-LCA with rapid degeneration of photoreceptors [43], a humanized knock-in mouse model carrying the most common CEP290-LCA mutation (c.2991 + 1655A>G) does not show obvious phenotypes [44], suggesting unique mechanisms of disease pathogenesis in humans. Notably, retinal organoids differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of a CEP290-LCA patient demonstrate disease-associated cilia findings in vitro [45]. Persistence of photoreceptor cell bodies in some LCA patients with advanced disease, despite undetectable visual function, suggest possibilities of vision restoration by targeted therapies [38].
3. Therapeutic strategies
As a transparent, compartmentalized and immune-privileged organ, it is self-evident why the eye offers exceptional opportunities for evaluating different treatment paradigms. However, designing treatment for congenital eye disease is still challenging. This reflects clinical presentation months after the period of perturbed in utero development, the involvement of multiple ocular tissues and cell types, as well as tremendous genetic heterogeneity. Each of the three diseases discussed here poses unique complexities regarding the timing and methods of delivery to the therapeutic targets. Retinal dystrophies are currently the most tractable for correction, benefitting from many decades of fundamental research in retinal genetics and cell biology, and the retina comprising of a single tissue. Despite its fiendishly complex neuronal composition and synaptic organization, the retina has been a focus for therapeutic trials because of its unique accessibility within the CNS. In contrast, congenital glaucoma involves anterior and posterior segment tissues, requiring therapeutic modification of multiple cell types including dysfunctional and dying lateral geniculate nucleus-projecting retinal ganglion cells. The challenges are further augmented in colobomata, which at a minimum manifest many months after arising during early development. Prevention of colobomata requires the identification of disease-causing genetic profiles and their precise correction before the initiation of the optic fissure closure at gestation week 16; such corrections are not feasible currently since tissue regeneration would be required at an unprecedented scale, with existing stem cells coaxed into repopulating the affected area. Cell transplantation represents another theoretical approach; however, it is unclear whether signaling cues required for donor cell engraftment, division and differentiation persist to recapitulate such lengthy periods of normal development. As a result, the following section largely focuses on therapeutic approaches developed in retinal disorders (Table 2), which provide a broader exemplar for the CNS, and that in time may be extended to other pediatric eye disorders. Considerable progress has been made, in part, because of a longer window of intervention opportunity for retinal diseases.
Table 2.
Pros and cons of major therapeutic approaches
| Successful examples | Strengths | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene therapy |
|
|
|
| Large and small molecule drugs |
|
Small molecule
|
|
| Cell replacement therapy |
|
|
|
3.1. Gene therapy
Gene therapy harnesses different vectors/vehicles for delivering desired gene products into affected tissues and/or cell types. A widely used approach for gene delivery in eye tissues is the use of viral vectors simply by injection at the preferred site and with low risk of immune response [46]. The low rate of integration into the host genome makes adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors a promising platform for gene therapy [47]. One successful example of this approach is the first FDA-approved drug for treatment of LCA caused by RPE65 loss-of-function mutations [38,48]; however, we should mention that the long-term data from clinical trials have been less encouraging [49]. A second potentially exciting approach is CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing [50], which can potentially correct disease-causing mutations in multiple scenarios (from retinal explants, humanized mice, non-human primates to patient iPSC-derived retinal organoids) [51]. However, the technique is currently constrained by limited editing efficiency [52] and off-target mutations that include induced chromosomal anomalies [53]. Another promising methodology is use of antisense oligonucleotides (AON) [54], which induce quite persistent suppression of pathological RNA transcripts by exon skipping and other mechanisms. Several of these are in therapeutic use for pediatric neurological disorders such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Spinal Muscular Atrophy, while AON-based therapy for CEP290-LCA has yielded encouraging results [55], with vision improvement without serious adverse effect reported in one clinical trial [56].
A key limitation of gene therapy for congenital eye diseases is the temporal window for effective treatment. AAV vectors cannot reach the target cells of fetus, and a vast majority of early-onset disorders already exhibit severe developmental defects or cell loss at birth [5]. The small packaging limit of AAV (<5kb) also restricts its application for diseases caused by larger genes. In such cases, alternative approaches include gene augmentation by delivering parts of the gene [57,58], use of lentiviral vectors with larger packaging capacity [59], or splitting the transgene into two separate AAV vectors [60]; however, the efficiency and/or safety of these approaches in humans require further investigations. In any case, it would be time-consuming and currently prohibitively expensive to tailor gene therapy for each causative mutation, particularly since a therapy effective for one mutation may not be readily extrapolated to phenotypes caused by another [61]. Thus, innovative mutation-independent strategies are needed to maintain cell survival or restore visual function. One encouraging example is provided by CRISPR-mediated knockdown of a key transcriptional regulator Nrl, which has generated longer survival of (dysfunctional) rod photoreceptors while preserving the cones that are essential for the macula and thus fine vision [62]. Viral-mediated expression of rod-derived cone viability factor (RdCVF) also shows promising effect in the maintenance of cone and rod photoreceptors in multiple mouse models of retinal degeneration [63]. Optogenetic therapies deliver light-activated ion channels to surviving retinal cell types (bipolar cell and retinal ganglion cells), restoring a degree of photosensitivity in animal models [64,65]; and clinical trials are in progress. In a related manner, engraftment of optogenetically engineered photoreceptors has achieved partial recovery of visual function in the murine retina [66]. Such results are naturally very encouraging; however, it remains to be determined whether this promise translates into long-lasting restoration of retinal function in humans.
3.2. Large and small molecule drugs
Small molecule drugs offer an effective and widely used approach, reflecting ease in administration and dosage control, stability, scale of synthesis and low cost [67]. Importantly, the ability of many small molecule drugs to cross the blood-brain (or even placental) barrier may facilitate treatment of early-onset ocular/neurological diseases. Pharmaceutical modulation of signaling pathways contributing to cell death is a more specific way to preserve their survival and function [68]. Photoswitchable ion channel blockers can also offer potential for restoring vision [69]. Small molecule drugs have been applied for reading through a stop codon, correcting the structure of mutated proteins or circumventing functions of abnormal proteins [5,70]. Notably, the readthrough drug PCT124 was reported to be effective in a Pax6 mutation iris coloboma model, leading to initiation of a phase II clinical trial [5]. Such approaches hold great potential for treating developmental defects caused by misregulation of signaling pathways, such as the ANG-TIE signaling pathway for congenital glaucoma. Antioxidants (e.g., vitamin A, vitamin B3, docosahexaenoic acid, lutein), anti-apoptotic factors (e.g., tauroursodeoxycholic acid, rasagiline, norgestrel, and myriocin) and neurotrophic factors (e.g., ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)) have been evaluated in the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases [40]. Therapeutic antibodies have been extensively used to neutralize bioactive factors, as illustrated by intravitreally administered monoclonals to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that are effective in treatments of neovascular age-related macular degeneration [71].
A major challenge for developing relevant drug targets is identification of appropriate molecules with excellent pharmacological benefit and pharmacokinetics and low off-target effects [67], especially in case of small molecules that can penetrate various tissues. However, ninety percent of drug candidates fail to progress from Phase I trials to clinical use [72], partly because a majority of the drugs are identified using adherent cell culture or small animal models, which, although offering valuable mechanistic insights, do not fully recapitulate human pathobiology. Recent advances in three-dimensional human retinal organoids that structurally and functionally, at least in part, mimic in vivo tissues can provide a promising platform for complementing the existing strategies for identifying drug candidates [73]. A recent breakthrough of deep-learning program for determining three-dimensional shapes of proteins without crystallography should accelerate the process of drug design and discovery [74].
3.3. Cell replacement therapy
When affected cells are lost or grossly abnormal at infancy, regenerative medicine may offer a plausible approach for restoring at least partial vision. A few attempts have been made to stimulate regeneration of lost cells from other cell types [75,76], whereas others have generated desired cell types from pluripotent stem cells and transplanted the products into the eye [77]. In LCA and early-onset retinal degeneration, the need to replace photoreceptors for restoring vision requires donor cell survival, maturation (including development of the outer segment) and functional integration to form synapses with host retinal interneurons. Transplantation of photoreceptors was previously demonstrated to improve visual function in animal models, yet recent studies indicate transfer of cytoplasmic material between the donor and host cells, potentially offering unanticipated opportunities for therapeutic delivery [73,78]. In contrast, transplantation of stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium that can be produced at high efficiency and purity offers hope in preclinical and clinical trials for age-related macular degeneration [79,80]. In congenital glaucoma, the loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) requires the elongation of axons, integration into the optic nerve and projection to the lateral geniculate nucleus. Despite efficient generation of functional RGCs from pluripotent stem cells, transplantation of these cells has yet to yield desirable results, with extensive investigations continuing in preclinical models [81].
A major concern in using iPSC-derived products is related to genomic stability [82]. Although no adverse effects are reported at this early stage, possible deleterious outcomes, such as tumor formation or degeneration of transplanted cells, may take a longer time frame to unravel. Embryonic stem cells have raised ethical concerns and may trigger immune response, whereas the use of iPSCs may not be feasible for congenital diseases. CRISPR-based approaches have also been utilized for correcting mutations in patient iPSC-derived retinal organoids [83]. Given the immense interest in stem cells, rapid advancements are expected in generation of photoreceptors from stem cells [84] and in gene-editing. Further investigations are necessary to overcome numerous challenges for correct functional integration of transplanted cells into the host retina with minimal undesirable consequences [85].
Outstanding questions
Several questions remain. Can we accelerate gene discovery for pediatric eye diseases? Is high variability of congenital eye phenotypes caused by gene/pathway interactions? How to efficiently and safely design prevention or treatment paradigms for congenital diseases in utero? Is it possible to selectively manipulate signaling pathways to expedite and improve the specificity of treatments? What would criteria/standards be for devising such therapies for distinct early onset diseases affecting the children?
Search strategy and selection criteria
The references were identified using Google Scholar and PubMed search engines with the search terms “coloboma” or “congenital glaucoma” or “Leber congenital amaurosis” or “congenital eye diseases” or “coloboma AND genetics” or “congenital glaucoma AND genetics” or “Leber congenital amaurosis AND genetics” or “gene therapy AND congenital eye diseases” or “small molecule AND congenital eye diseases” or “cell replacement therapy AND congenital eye diseases” or “human eye development” or “treatment AND congenital diseases”. Disease-associated genes were identified by the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (OMIM; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim) using keywords “coloboma” or “congenital glaucoma” or “Leber congenital amaurosis” and further selected using Google Scholar and Genecards engines with the search terms “[gene name] AND [disease]”. All references were considered with preference for the most recently published works.
Conclusions
Congenital ocular diseases exhibit extensive genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Despite identification of many disease-causing genes, genetic defects remain to be discovered in a large number of congenital eye diseases. We believe a gene-independent approach will be desirable for developing therapies of such a divergent cohort. A network-based approach by modulating pathways associated with congenital eye diseases and a combination of gene and small-molecule based therapies would likely have promising impact on treating early-onset eye diseases. Nonsense suppression therapy, neurotrophic and antiapoptotic as well as other small molecule drugs might help in maintaining the survival of defective cells and achieve at least a partially desirable treatment outcome.
Declaration of Competing Interest
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
Contributors
All authors conceived the original draft and edited the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Ian MacDonald at Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, for providing the fundus images of RPE65-LCA patients. We apologize to those whose work could not be included due to space limitations. Graphic illustrations are performed by Alan Hoofring in the Medical Art department of NIH. The research in authors’ laboratories is supported by Intramural Research Program of the National Eye Institute (ZIAEY000450 and ZIAEY000546 to A.S.) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT 165920 to O.J.L.). The funders did not have any role in design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Lead contact: Anand Swaroop
Contributor Information
Holly.Y. Chen, Email: holly.chen@nih.gov.
Ordan J. Lehmann, Email: olehmann@ualberta.ca.
Anand Swaroop, Email: swaroopa@nei.nih.gov.
References
- 1.Graw J. Eye development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010;90:343–386. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)90010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cardozo MJ, Almuedo-Castillo M, Bovolenta P. Patterning the vertebrate retina with morphogenetic signaling pathways. Neuroscientist. 2020;26(2):185–196. doi: 10.1177/1073858419874016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miesfeld JB, Brown NL. Eye organogenesis: a hierarchical view of ocular development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;132:351–393. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heavner W, Pevny L. Eye development and retinogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(12) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ohuchi H, Sato K, Habuta M, Fujita H, Bando T. Congenital eye anomalies: more mosaic than thought? Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2019;59(3):56–73. doi: 10.1111/cga.12304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Patel A, Sowden JC. Genes and pathways in optic fissure closure. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;91:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kohwi M, Doe CQ. Temporal fate specification and neural progenitor competence during development. Nat. Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(12):823–838. doi: 10.1038/nrn3618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Manuel MN, Mi D, Mason JO, Price DJ. Regulation of cerebral cortical neurogenesis by the Pax6 transcription factor. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:70. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoshino A, Ratnapriya R, Brooks MJ, Chaitankar V, Wilken MS, Zhang C. Molecular anatomy of the developing human Retina. Dev Cell. 2017;43:763–779. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Graw J. The genetic and molecular basis of congenital eye defects. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4(11):876–888. doi: 10.1038/nrg1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wright AF, Chakarova CF, Abd El-Aziz MM, Bhattacharya SS. Photoreceptor degeneration: genetic and mechanistic dissection of a complex trait. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(4):273–284. doi: 10.1038/nrg2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gogate P, Gilbert C, Zin A. Severe visual impairment and blindness in infants: causes and opportunities for control. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2011;18(2):109–114. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.80698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Warburg M. Genetics of microphthalmos. Int Ophthalmol. 1981;4(1-2):45–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00139580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Azuma N, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H, Tadokoro K, Asaka A, Kawase E. Mutations of the PAX6 gene detected in patients with a variety of optic-nerve malformations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(6):1565–1570. doi: 10.1086/375555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.ALSomiry AS, Gregory-Evans CY, Gregory-Evans K. An update on the genetics of ocular coloboma. Human Genet. 2019;138(8-9):865–880. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rowan S, Conley KW, Le TT, Donner AL, Maas RL, Brown NL. Notch signaling regulates growth and differentiation in the mammalian lens. Dev Biol. 2008;321(1):111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Patel A, Anderson G, Galea G, Balys M, Sowden JC. Development; 2020. A molecular and cellular analysis of human embryonic optic fissure closure related to the eye malformation coloboma. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Badawi AH, Al-Muhaylib AA, Al Owaifeer AM, Al-Essa RS, Al-Shahwan SA. Primary congenital glaucoma: an updated review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2019;33(4):382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2019.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.He Z, Bui BV, Vingrys AJ. The rate of functional recovery from acute IOP elevation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(11):4872–4880. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ko F, Papadopoulos M, Khaw PT. Primary congenital glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:177–189. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gage PJ, Camper SA. Pituitary homeobox 2, a novel member of the bicoid-related family of homeobox genes, is a potential regulator of anterior structure formation. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(3):457–464. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.3.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mears AJ, Jordan T, Mirzayans F, Dubois S, Kume T, Parlee M. Mutations of the forkhead/winged-helix gene, FKHL7, in patients with Axenfeld-Rieger anomaly. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(5):1316–1328. doi: 10.1086/302109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smith RS, Zabaleta A, Kume T, Savinova OV, Kidson SH, Martin JE. Haploinsufficiency of the transcription factors FOXC1 and FOXC2 results in aberrant ocular development. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(7):1021–1032. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.7.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lehmann OJ, Ebenezer ND, Jordan T, Fox M, Ocaka L, Payne A. Chromosomal duplication involving the forkhead transcription factor gene FOXC1 causes iris hypoplasia and glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67(5):1129–1135. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9297(07)62943-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jamieson RV, Perveen R, Kerr B, Carette M, Yardley J, Heon E. Domain disruption and mutation of the bZIP transcription factor, MAF, associated with cataract, ocular anterior segment dysgenesis and coloboma. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(1):33–42. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stoilov I, Akarsu AN, Sarfarazi M. Identification of three different truncating mutations in cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) as the principal cause of primary congenital glaucoma (Buphthalmos) in families linked to the GLC3A locus on chromosome 2p21. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(4):641–647. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.4.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bejjani BA, Lewis RA, Tomey KF, Anderson KL, Dueker DK, Jabak M. Mutations in CYP1B1, the gene for cytochrome P4501B1, are the predominant cause of primary congenital glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(2):325–333. doi: 10.1086/301725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chambers D, Wilson L, Maden M, Lumsden A. RALDH-independent generation of retinoic acid during vertebrate embryogenesis by CYP1B1. Development. 2007;134(7):1369–1383. doi: 10.1242/dev.02815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matt N, Dupe V, Garnier JM, Dennefeld C, Chambon P, Mark M. Retinoic acid-dependent eye morphogenesis is orchestrated by neural crest cells. Development. 2005;132(21):4789–4800. doi: 10.1242/dev.02031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Melki R, Colomb E, Lefort N, Brezin AP, Garchon HJ. CYP1B1 mutations in French patients with early-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. J Med Genet. 2004;41(9):647–651. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.020024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thomson BR, Heinen S, Jeansson M, Ghosh AK, Fatima A, Sung HK. A lymphatic defect causes ocular hypertension and glaucoma in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(10):4320–4324. doi: 10.1172/JCI77162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Souma T, Tompson SW, Thomson BR, Siggs OM, Kizhatil K, Yamaguchi S. Angiopoietin receptor TEK mutations underlie primary congenital glaucoma with variable expressivity. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(7):2575–2587. doi: 10.1172/JCI85830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leppanen VM, Saharinen P, Alitalo K. Structural basis of Tie2 activation and Tie2/Tie1 heterodimerization. Proceed Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(17):4376–4381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616166114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim J, Park DY, Bae H, Park DY, Kim D, Lee CK. Impaired angiopoietin/Tie2 signaling compromises Schlemm's canal integrity and induces glaucoma. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(10):3877–3896. doi: 10.1172/JCI94668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thomson BR, Souma T, Tompson SW, Onay T, Kizhatil K, Siggs OM. Angiopoietin-1 is required for Schlemm's canal development in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(12):4421–4436. doi: 10.1172/JCI95545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kumaran N, Moore AT, Weleber RG, Michaelides M. Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: clinical features, molecular genetics and therapeutic interventions. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(9):1147–1154. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koenekoop RK. An overview of Leber congenital amaurosis: a model to understand human retinal development. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49(4):379–398. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG. Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA): Potential for improvement of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(5):1680–1695. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-26672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kondkar AA, Abu-Amero KK. Leber congenital amaurosis: Current genetic basis, scope for genetic testing and personalized medicine. Exp Eye Res. 2019;189 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen HY, Kelley RA, Li T, Swaroop A. Primary cilia biogenesis and associated retinal ciliopathies. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rachel RA, Li T, Swaroop A. Photoreceptor sensory cilia and ciliopathies: focus on CEP290, RPGR and their interacting proteins. Cilia. 2012;1(1):22. doi: 10.1186/2046-2530-1-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ramsbottom S, Miles C, Sayer J. Murine Cep290 phenotypes are modified by genetic backgrounds and provide an impetus for investigating disease modifier alleles. F1000Research. 2015;4:590. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6959.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chang B, Khanna H, Hawes N, Jimeno D, He S, Lillo C. In-frame deletion in a novel centrosomal/ciliary protein CEP290/NPHP6 perturbs its interaction with RPGR and results in early-onset retinal degeneration in the rd16 mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(11):1847–1857. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Garanto A, van Beersum SE, Peters TA, Roepman R, Cremers FP, Collin RW. Unexpected CEP290 mRNA splicing in a humanized knock-in mouse model for Leber congenital amaurosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shimada H, Lu Q, Insinna-Kettenhofen C, Nagashima K, English MA, Semler EM. In vitro modeling using ciliopathy-patient-derived cells reveals distinct cilia dysfunctions caused by CEP290 Mutations. Cell Rep. 2017;20(2):384–396. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sahel JA, Dalkara D. Gene therapy for retinal dystrophy. Nat Med. 2019;25(2):198–199. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0346-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang D, Tai PWL, Gao G. Adeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(5):358–378. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0012-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Russell S, Bennett J, Wellman JA, Chung DC, Yu ZF, Tillman A. Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10097):849–860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31868-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gardiner KL, Cideciyan AV, Swider M, Dufour VL, Sumaroka A, Komaromy AM. Long-term structural outcomes of late-stage RPE65 gene therapy. Mol Ther. 2020;28(1):266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jang HK, Song B, Hwang GH, Bae S. Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(7):1016–1027. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0466-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Maeder ML, Stefanidakis M, Wilson CJ, Baral R, Barrera LA, Bounoutas GS. Development of a gene-editing approach to restore vision loss in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10. Nat Med. 2019;25(2):229–233. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0327-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gapinske M, Luu A, Winter J, Woods WS, Kostan KA, Shiva N. CRISPR-SKIP: programmable gene splicing with single base editors. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1482-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zuccaro MV, Xu J, Mitchell C, Marin D, Zimmerman R, Rana B. Allele-specific chromosome removal after Cas9 Cleavage in Human Embryos. Cell. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bennett CF. Therapeutic antisense oligonucleotides are coming of age. Annu Rev Med. 2019;70:307–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-041217-010829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dulla K, Aguila M, Lane A, Jovanovic K, Parfitt DA, Schulkens I. Splice-Modulating Oligonucleotide QR-110 Restores CEP290 mRNA and Function in Human c.2991+1655A>G LCA10 Models. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;12:730–740. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG, Drack AV, Ho AC, Charng J, Garafalo AV. Effect of an intravitreal antisense oligonucleotide on vision in Leber congenital amaurosis due to a photoreceptor cilium defect. Nat Med. 2019;25(2):225–228. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0295-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang W, Li L, Su Q, Gao G, Khanna H. Gene therapy using a miniCEP290 fragment delays photoreceptor degeneration in a mouse model of leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29(1):42–50. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mookherjee S, Chen HY, Isgrig K, Yu W, Hiriyanna S, Levron R. A CEP290 C-terminal domain complements the mutant CEP290 of Rd16 Mice In Trans and Rescues Retinal Degeneration. Cell Rep. 2018;25(3):611–623. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.043. e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Burnight ER, Wiley LA, Drack AV, Braun TA, Anfinson KR, Kaalberg EE. CEP290 gene transfer rescues Leber congenital amaurosis cellular phenotype. Gene Ther. 2014;21(7):662–672. doi: 10.1038/gt.2014.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Allocca M, Doria M, Petrillo M, Colella P, Garcia-Hoyos M, Gibbs D. Serotype-dependent packaging of large genes in adeno-associated viral vectors results in effective gene delivery in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(5):1955–1964. doi: 10.1172/JCI34316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ghazi NG, Abboud EB, Nowilaty SR, Alkuraya H, Alhommadi A, Cai H. Treatment of retinitis pigmentosa due to MERTK mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: results of a phase I trial. Hum Genet. 2016;135(3):327–343. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1637-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu W, Mookherjee S, Chaitankar V, Hiriyanna S, Kim JW, Brooks M. Nrl knockdown by AAV-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 prevents retinal degeneration in mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14716. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Byrne LC, Dalkara D, Luna G, Fisher SK, Clerin E, Sahel JA. Viral-mediated RdCVF and RdCVFL expression protects cone and rod photoreceptors in retinal degeneration. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):105–116. doi: 10.1172/JCI65654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.McGregor JE, Godat T, Dhakal KR, Parkins K, Strazzeri JM, Bateman BA. Optogenetic restoration of retinal ganglion cell activity in the living primate. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1703. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15317-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cronin T, Vandenberghe LH, Hantz P, Juttner J, Reimann A, Kacso AE. Efficient transduction and optogenetic stimulation of retinal bipolar cells by a synthetic adeno-associated virus capsid and promoter. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(9):1175–1190. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Garita-Hernandez M, Lampic M, Chaffiol A, Guibbal L, Routet F, Santos-Ferreira T. Restoration of visual function by transplantation of optogenetically engineered photoreceptors. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4524. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12330-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tambuyzer E, Vandendriessche B, Austin CP, Brooks PJ, Larsson K, Miller Needleman KI. Therapies for rare diseases: therapeutic modalities, progress and challenges ahead. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(2):93–111. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mockel A, Obringer C, Hakvoort TB, Seeliger M, Lamers WH, Stoetzel C. Pharmacological modulation of the retinal unfolded protein response in Bardet-Biedl syndrome reduces apoptosis and preserves light detection ability. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(44):37483–37494. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.386821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hull K, Benster T, Manookin MB, Trauner D, Van Gelder RN, Laprell L. Photopharmacologic Vision Restoration Reduces Pathological Rhythmic Field Potentials in Blind Mouse Retina. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49999-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chen Y, Chen Y, Jastrzebska B, Golczak M, Gulati S, Tang H. A novel small molecule chaperone of rod opsin and its potential therapy for retinal degeneration. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1976. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04261-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Holekamp NM. Review of neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment options. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(10 Suppl):S172–SS81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Horvath P, Aulner N, Bickle M, Davies AM, Nery ED, Ebner D. Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(11):751–769. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kruczek K, Swaroop A. Pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal organoids for disease modeling and development of therapies. Stem Cells. 2020;38(10):1206–1215. doi: 10.1002/stem.3239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.AlQuraishi M. End-to-End Differentiable Learning of Protein Structure. Cell Syst. 2019;8(4):292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.006. e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jorstad NL, Wilken MS, Grimes WN, Wohl SG, VandenBosch LS, Yoshimatsu T. Stimulation of functional neuronal regeneration from Muller glia in adult mice. Nature. 2017;548(7665):103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature23283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fernandez-Nogales M, Murcia-Belmonte V, Chen HY, Herrera E. The peripheral eye: a neurogenic area with potential to treat retinal pathologies? Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.West EL, Ribeiro J, Ali RR. Development of stem cell therapies for retinal degeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2020;12(8) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a035683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gasparini SJ, Llonch S, Borsch O, Ader M. Transplantation of photoreceptors into the degenerative retina: current state and future perspectives. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;69:1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.da Cruz L, Fynes K, Georgiadis O, Kerby J, Luo YH, Ahmado A. Phase 1 clinical study of an embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium patch in age-related macular degeneration. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(4):328–337. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mandai M, Kurimoto Y, Takahashi M. Autologous induced stem-cell-derived retinal cells for macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):792–793. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1706274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zhao C, Wang Q, Temple S. Stem cell therapies for retinal diseases: recapitulating development to replace degenerated cells. Development. 2017;144(8):1368–1381. doi: 10.1242/dev.133108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Henry MP, Hawkins JR, Boyle J, Bridger JM. The genomic health of human pluripotent stem cells: genomic instability and the consequences on nuclear organization. Front Genet. 2018;9:623. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Deng WL, Gao ML, Lei XL, Lv JN, Zhao H, He KW. Gene correction reverses ciliopathy and photoreceptor Loss in iPSC-derived retinal organoids from retinitis pigmentosa patients. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;10(4):1267–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mahato B, Kaya KD, Fan Y, Sumien N, Shetty RA, Zhang W. Pharmacologic fibroblast reprogramming into photoreceptors restores vision. Nature. 2020;581(7806):83–88. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Singh MS, Park SS, Albini TA, Canto-Soler MV, Klassen H, MacLaren RE. Retinal stem cell transplantation: Balancing safety and potential. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020;75 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.100779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


