Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 4;58(3):1083–1092. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa263

Table 2.

Accuracy metrics for species distribution models of Dermacentor variabilis ticks built with five modeling methods including GLM, MaxEnt, GAM, RF, and BRT

Method Dataset AUC TSS Deviance Mean omission
GLM Positive 0.92 0.76 0.23 0.15
All 0.90 0.70 0.80 0.15
GAM Positive 0.92 0.79 0.70 0.11
All 0.95 0.79 0.55 0.12
MaxEnt Positive 0.95 0.83 0.23 0.12
All 0.95 0.77 0.66 0.12
BRT Positive 0.91 0.77 0.27 0.13
All 0.90 0.69 0.89 0.15
RF Positive 0.93 0.81 0.20 0.10
All 0.96 0.79 0.47 0.11