Table 2.
Index | Pupil diameter | Surgical method | Pre-operative | 3 M follow-up | 12 M follow-up | One-year change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total coma (µm) | 6-mm | SMILE | 0.22 ± 0.21 | 0.36 ± 0.16 | 0.38 ± 0.18 | 0.16 ± 0.23a |
0.012b 0.021c |
Femto-LASIK | 0.21 ± 0.09 | 0.41 ± 0.23 | 0.46 ± 0.31 | 0.25 ± 0.23a | |||
PRK | 0.24 ± 0.17 | 0.45 ± 0.18 | 0.48 ± 0.20 | 0.24 ± 0.24a | |||
3-mm | SMILE | 0.11 ± 0.10 | 0.14 ± 0.08 | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 0.04 ± 0.12 |
0.313b 0.791c |
|
Femto-LASIK | 0.17 ± 0.62 | 0.14 ± 0.11 | 0.16 ± 0.15 | -0.01 ± 0.64 | |||
PRK | 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 0.14 ± 0.13 | 0.03 ± 0.11 | |||
Total SA (µm) | 6-mm | SMILE | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 0.11 ± 0.09a |
< 0.001a < 0.001c |
Femto-LASIK | 0.21 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.10 | 0.24 ± 0.10a | |||
PRK | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.12 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 0.26 ± 0.13a | |||
3-mm | SMILE | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | -0.01 ± 0.04 |
0.125b 0.482c |
|
Femto-LASIK | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.01 ± 0.03 | |||
PRK | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.04 | |||
Total trefoil (µm) | 6-mm | SMILE | 0.14 ± 0.19 | 0.14 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | -0.01 ± 0.17 |
0.198b 0.271c |
Femto-LASIK | 0.14 ± 0.06 | 0.18 ± 0.19 | 0.16 ± 0.15 | 0.02 ± 0.19 | |||
PRK | 0.14 ± 0.08 | 0.16 ± 0.08 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.01 ± 0.11 | |||
3-mm | SMILE | 0.12 ± 0.09 | 0.16 ± 0.08 | 0.14 ± 0.08 | 0.02 ± 0.12 |
0.122b 0.342c |
|
Femto-LASIK | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.14 ± 0.08 | 0.13 ± 0.12 | 0.00 ± 0.11 | |||
PRK | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.15 ± 0.08 | 0.14 ± 0.10 | 0.02 ± 0.11 |
a Within subgroup statistically significant change
b Comparison of one-year change in indices between SMILE and femto-LASIK
c Comparison of one-year change in indices between SMILE and PRK
M months, SA spherical aberration, PRK photorefractive keratectomy, SMILE small incision lenticule extraction, femto-LASIK femtosecond-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis