Table 3.
Index | Pupil diameter | Surgical method | Pre-operative | 3 M follow-up | 12 M follow-up | One-year change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total coma (µm) | 6-mm | SMILE | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.52 ± 0.27 | 0.56 ± 0.28 | 0.36 ± 0.28a |
0.535b 0.289c |
Femto-LASIK | 0.21 ± 0.09 | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 0.54 ± 0.22 | 0.33 ± 0.19a | |||
PRK | 0.21 ± 0.10 | 0.48 ± 0.24 | 0.52 ± 0.26 | 0.31 ± 0.24a | |||
3-mm | SMILE | 0.09 ± 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.11 | 0.16 ± 0.12 | 0.05 ± 0.11a |
0.233b 0.823c |
|
Femto-LASIK | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.06 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.06 ± 0.08a | |||
PRK | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.14 ± 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.10a | |||
Total SA (µm) | 6-mm | SMILE | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.15 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.24 ± 0.14a |
0.006b < 0.001c |
Femto-LASIK | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.12 | 0.53 ± 0.12 | 0.30 ± 0.13a | |||
PRK | 0.22 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.21 | 0.60 ± 0.21 | 0.38 ± 0.21a | |||
3-mm | SMILE | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.04 |
0.106b 0.722c |
|
Femto-LASIK | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.04 | |||
PRK | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | -0.00 ± 0.06 | |||
Total trefoil (µm) | 6-mm | SMILE | 0.14 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.09 |
0.426b 0.130c |
Femto-LASIK | 0.17 ± 0.10 | 0.22 ± 0.15 | 0.21 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.16 | |||
PRK | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.19 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.12a | |||
3-mm | SMILE | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.21 ± 0.12 | 0.23 ± 0.10 | 0.10 ± 0.15a |
< 0.001b 0.006c |
|
Femto-LASIK | 0.15 ± 0.09 | 0.16 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.13 | 0.03 ± 0.14 | |||
PRK | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 0.02 ± 0.14 |
a Within sub-group statistically significant change
b Comparison of one-year change in indices between SMILE and femto-LASIK
c Comparison of one-year change in indices between SMILEand PRK
M months, SA spherical aberration, PRK photorefractive keratectomy, SMILE small incision lenticule extraction, femto-LASIK femtosecond-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis